February 18, 2006

Labor Unions -- Representing Workers Not Top Priority

This from Robert Novak's column today.

The first documents received from unions in the Labor Department's demand for detailed financial disclosures, for the first time strictly enforcing the 1959 Landrum-Griffin labor reform act, suggest embarrassment by organized labor when the information is made public next month.

Early reports show the AFL-CIO spent $49 million (27 percent of its total annual budget) on political and lobbying activities but only $30 million (or 16.5 percent) to represent its members. That gap contributed to the breakaway from the AFL-CIO of the Teamsters, the Service Employees and other unions.

Another document reveals that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers spent $791 million, constituting 85 percent of its 2005 budget, purchasing fixed assets and investments.

Now tell me, why would anyone willingly join any of these organizations? Why should anyone be required to join such organizations as a condition of employment?

Seems to me that the time has come for a national Right-To-Work law -- let the unions survive in the free market.

Posted by: Greg at 03:20 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
5kb generated in CPU 0.0039, elapsed 0.0099 seconds.
19 queries taking 0.007 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]