April 25, 2006

And They Said It Couldn't Happen Here

Certain commenters have, in the past, argued that I shouldn't talk about Canadian policies that infringe upon the religious liberties of Christians in their business practices and public speech. I've been told that since such abuses are not occurring here in the United States, that such abuses are irrelevant -- especially when they have to do with the freedom of Americans to speak out against homosexual marriage or special rights for homosexuals, or to conduct their business in a manner which does not give aid and comfort to what they view as the homosexual political agenda.

One such case in Canada had to do with a Christian printer who refused to print material for a homosexual rights group. Canadian governmetn authorities forced the printer to do the printing job, and also imposed monetary damages upon the business owner. But of course, I'm told, such an abuse of human rights by govenrment officials could never happen here.

Until it did, in Arlington Virginia -- literally a stone's throw from our nation's capital, and the charters of freedom that ennunciate the principles of liberty upon which this nation is founded. Unfortunately, they have been rendered null and void in Arlington. That is the message of the so-called Arlington Human Rights Commission to Tim Bono of Bono Film and Video.

In a case similar to a Canadian Christian printerÂ’s punishment for declining a job for a homosexual activist group, an Arlington, Virginia, video duplicator has been ordered by the Arlington County Human Rights Commission to do a job for a lesbian activist.

The April 18 order follows a March 9 hearing in which Tim Bono of Bono Film and Video cited constitutional freedom of religion protection in refusing to duplicate two pro-homosexual films for lesbian activist Lillian Vincenz, according to the Family Policy Network (FPN), which is seeking clients for a class-action suit against the county.

Bono, a Christian, said he did not want to violate his Biblical values by assisting the promotion of homosexual behavior. Bono Film & Video informs potential customers that the firm does not duplicate material that the firm deems obscene, could embarrass employees, hurt the companyÂ’s reputation, or that runs counter to the company's Christian and ethical values, Bono told FPN.

After Bono rebuffed her request, Vincenz asked Arlington County officials to force Bono to duplicate her videos. The Arlington Human Rights Commission began an investigation and held a public hearing on March 9 to discuss the alleged discrimination.

As of April 25, neither Bono nor Vincenz had responded to the commissionÂ’s order, Raul Torres, executive director of the Human Rights Commission, told Concerned Women for AmericaÂ’s Culture & Family Institute (CFI).

If Bono refuses to do the job, “after a reasonable amount of time, the commission can reassemble and discuss why the remedy was not done,” Raul said. The commission could then forward the case to the full county Board of Commissioners and ask them for permission to file a discrimination complaint in Arlington Circuit Court, he said.

In other words, what has happened here is that a Christian business owner has been directed to produce material that runs directly contrary to his religious beliefs. A right guaranteed by the US Constitution has been overthrown in the name of promoting "tolerance" for homosexuality. But where is the tolerance for Christianity?

And by the way -- whatever happened to what we were all once told was a guiding principle of the homosexual rights movement, that all that was being asked was for homosexuals to be left alone. It was supposed to be a matter of "live and let live." But instead of tolerance, what is now demanded is acceptance by all and subservience by those who disagree.

Whatever happened to the First Amendment and freedom of religion? What about Tim Bono's right to be left alone? What of his freedom to practice his religion in his professional life?

And whatever happened to "it can't happen here"?

Posted by: Greg at 01:54 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 672 words, total size 4 kb.

1 To be clear, I don't think you have ever been told that such things CAN'T happen here. I know in the past I've told you that if such things DO happen here, I'd oppose them. Now I'll note that your source is "Concerned Women for America" so we really must operate on the assumption that it's either not the whole story or may even be a complete and total fabrication.

But operating on the hypothetical that this situtation actually were to occur, I would say the printer is under no obligation to take on the client. Where we disagree is that I don't think it's acceptable to deny the humanity of gay people just to prevent a situation like this from arising.

Posted by: dolphin at Wed Apr 26 03:04:11 2006 (3uG8B)

2 I've deleted nothing, dolphin. Would you be so kind as to tell me what is missing, and i will restore it from my email notifications. Just one more of your brilliant conclusions -- from the guy who regularly deletes comments from folks he disagrees with and has a history of blatantly mischaracterizing (and even editing quotes to twist them into the precise opposite of their clear meaning).

Please note, I cite an earlier story from one of the local television stations regarding the case. Unfortunately, neither the station nor any other news outlet have seen fit to follow up on the story. Hence my use of the CWA report on the matter. I'd rather have a different source, too.

And also, I don't see anyone denying the humanity of any other individual -- unless, of course, Mr. Bono's humanity is being denied by the denial of human rights by the Human Rights Commission.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Apr 26 12:26:06 2006 (wUumh)

3 I posted a new comment in "“Gayby Boom” Raises Lifestyle Issues In SF" and "Leak Double Standard?" both of which are now gone.

And would you like to provide some evidence that I delete or edit people's comment because I disagree with them? Anyone who visits my site right this second will find disagreements in the comments on the very front page. I have only deleted posts from one person in the entire time I've owned the blog, and that would be you and it was not because you disagree agree with me. It was because you deciding to be rude and insulting and clearly violate my published posting rules. Even then I did not delete you but rather sent you and email asking you to please stop commenting if you couldn't behave as an adult. In otherwords I asked you to obey the house rules or leave the private property which is my web server. When you refused stop trespassing on my private property, only then did I start to delete your comments.

Posted by: dolphin at Thu Apr 27 01:44:05 2006 (3uG8B)

4 Actually, I recall the matter very differently -- but I won't pursue the issue any further, given your tendency to define every disagreement as an attack based upon anti-homosexual bias, even as you and your friends engage in attacks to which you will not allow a response. My comments, in fact, were less scathing than those you post here.

And unlike you, I'll gladly restore your comments, as soon as I can find them.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Apr 27 11:33:23 2006 (OByup)

5 The Gayby Boom comment must have been eaten by the system. I have no record of it, and apologize for that.

I've restored the Leak comment.

Best I can do, dolphin.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Apr 27 11:49:53 2006 (OByup)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
12kb generated in CPU 0.0042, elapsed 0.0104 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0074 seconds, 34 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]