January 26, 2006

Abuse of Process To Frustrate Justice

I cannot believe that the Supreme Court is going to consider this case.

The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide when death row inmates may challenge lethal injection as a method of capital punishment, in a surprise decision issued after the justices dramatically stopped the execution of a Florida prisoner who was already strapped to a gurney preparing to die.

Clarence E. Hill, 48, convicted of murdering a Pensacola police officer in 1982, had refused a final meal and needles had punctured his arm when the Supreme Court stayed his execution. The court said it would hear his claim that he should have an opportunity to argue that his civil rights would be violated because the chemicals used to execute him would cause excessive pain.

Excuse me, but the entire process is about KILLING someone. I frankly don’t care if it hurts – their crimes are of such magnitude that they are being put down like the mouth-frothing rabid dogs that they are. If they suffer, so be it – it is merited pain and suffering.

No, this is just one more attempt to prevent the just punishment of the worst among us.

Posted by: Greg at 01:11 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
5kb generated in CPU 0.0048, elapsed 0.0109 seconds.
19 queries taking 0.0077 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]