July 26, 2005

Will This Be Counted As A Hate Crime?

Really.

I mean, a Catholic parish has set up a monument to those slain by abortion. It is on church grounds, and is a reflection of the teachings of the church. On the last three months, the monument has been desecrated seven times -- vandalized and knocked off its pedastal. Do you think we have a prima facie case for treating this as a hate crime?

"When it's the seventh time, I question whether this is some sort of desecration or hate crime," said the church pastor, Father Henry Zinno. "When it's constant, obviously someone is making an effort to knock it down. By the seventh time there is a clear message."

The pastor has called the police. He's asked the church's 1,600 families to pay close attention as they drive by. And he had metal bars installed on the front and back of the stone memorial.

And still, the 4-foot monument that has been blessed by the bishop keeps being knocked to the ground.

"We keep putting it back up and calling the police," Zinno said, adding that it takes three or four men to lift it each time. "There's not much we can do."

But when Zinno found the stone rectangle lying on its side this weekend, he knew something more had to be done.

"Every time something like this happens, we announce it to parishioners," he said. "People got pretty upset about it."

The church has decided to put up motion detector lights. And a parishioner agreed to put iron rods into the monument to make it impossible to move.

One does not "accidently" knock over a piece of stone that takes three or four people to re-seat.

The wind does not simply start blowing it over.

This is a deliberate malicious attempt to silence a religious message.

It is an intentional act of hate against those who believe the truth that the monument proclaims.

It is a planned assault on rights explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution by those who seek to coerce acceptance of one which is not there at all..

Posted by: Greg at 01:47 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 361 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Didn't you know - you can't be a bigot against the dominant paradigm!

The only reason I hesitate to call this a hate crime is because I loathe the concept of them. Punishing why someone does something is ridiculous.

Bartleby

Posted by: Subjugator at Wed Jul 27 02:01:26 2005 (lkCzp)

2 I'm not a fan of hate crimes laws, but since they exist...

Besides -- we do punish people differently based upon the motive for their crime. It is all part of the state of mind that is an element of the crime in so many instances. Why shouldn't a criminal act calculated to prevent someone from exercising a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution be treated differently than a criminal act committed because someone was drunk?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Jul 27 03:00:18 2005 (pm0NC)

3 I think behavior should be criminalized, not why the behavior was committed. Now - if someone lacks intent, that's one thing, but if someone does something on purpose (say, I beat someone with a baseball bat), does it somehow make it worse that I did it because he has red hair than if I'd done it because he yelled too loudly outside of my house?

Bartleby

Posted by: Bartleby at Thu Jul 28 08:58:36 2005 (lkCzp)

4 But let's use your example and take it a bit further. Doesn't an unprovoked attack deserve a more severw punishment than one which is provoked? And what about an attack intended to intimidate a witness in a court case -- does it merit a more severw punishment?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Jul 28 10:12:17 2005 (RbE9h)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0044, elapsed 0.012 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0088 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]