May 25, 2005

Some Folks Really DonÂ’t Get It

Now I understand that the two police chiefs in New Hampshire who have filed trespassing charges against illegal border jumpers have engaged in creative interpretation of the law that could be called “constabulary activism”.

And IÂ’ll even concede that there is a question of whether state and local law enforcement officials have the jurisdiction to enforce federal laws (for example, a friendÂ’s former roommate held her mail hostage after she moved out in a dispute over a phone bill, and the city cops rightly pointed out that they generally lacked jurisdiction over cases of tampering with or stealing mail).

But surely there is no dispute that those in this country in violation of our nationÂ’s laws and borders are NOT citizens.

But then again, maybe there is.

LouAnn Fornataro had harsh words for the police.
“The people of New Hampshire ought to be outraged,” she said. “These chiefs of police have become vigilantes. The fact that they wear badges does not make them less than vigilantes. A law-enforcement officer has the responsibility to protect citizens from vigilantes. At the moment the vigilantes in New Ipswich and Hudson are wearing badges.”

Uh, Lou Ann – they aren’t citizens. That is precisely the problem. They are foreign criminals and invaders who are breaking American law, and the police departments in those two towns are trying to see to it that the laws of this country are enforced by the proper authorities. That isn’t being a vigilante – that is being a good cop and a good citizen.

And if you think being a border-jumping illegal invader is the same as being a US citizen, then you are clearly either nuts or stupid. Which is it?

And by the way, you will love this absurd quote, too.

Before stopping in Hudson with a petition signed by over 100 people, the task force went to New Ipswich, where they presented a similar petition to Chamberlain. Mark MacKenzie, a spokesman for the task force, said the citations sent the wrong message to the rest of the country.
“And the message is not receiving a lot of support. Immigration is a complicated issue. People are in different phases of the immigration process trying to become legal citizens of this country,” MacKenzie said.

Uh, immigration may be a complex issue, but let me clarify something for you. Those who are actually in the immigration process trying to become legal citizens are not what the issue is here. They are not being cited. The folks getting the citations, and objected to by most Americans, are those who are NOT in the process of trying to become legal citizens, who are NOT here legally, and are therefore VIOLATING THE LAW. Until you and your fellow advocates of open borders deal with that minor detail, you wonÂ’t get very far with most of us.

Posted by: Greg at 12:17 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 486 words, total size 3 kb.

1 If local police don't have jurisdiction in federal crimes, then why do they respond to bank robberies?

Posted by: Fox2! at Sat May 28 05:42:52 2005 (QK6bM)

2 Because they are illegal under both state and federal law.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat May 28 07:12:19 2005 (vm849)

3 Also because they involve a crime of violence, and there is a much clearer public safety issue.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat May 28 07:13:39 2005 (vm849)

4 How dare you twist the article around by not quoting every letter of it. Oh well, I guess it's just another case of an attack by The Dishonest And Intellectually Deficient Right.

Posted by: dolphin at Sun May 29 23:14:32 2005 (V5cZa)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0035, elapsed 0.0186 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0161 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]