December 04, 2005

Some Advice For Cops

Columnist Vin Sprynowicz offers the following suggestion on how to end the all too common problem of cops shooting off duty cops -- especially black off-duty cops.

Instead of disarming off-duty cops so the police can continue to feel free to shoot anyone out of uniform who they see with a gun (especially if he's black), why not alter police training as follows?

"This is an armed nation. Twenty-five percent of your fellow 'civilians' own firearms, and have a God-given right to carry them around. Except for writing traffic tickets for revenue, they have just as much right to chase and apprehend a fleeing felon -- or to present a weapon in defense of themselves or others -- as you do. This includes black folks. Get used to it.

"So, even though it may initially seem to make our jobs harder, let's stop hassling people when we perceive they have guns. If a call comes in reporting a 'man with a gun,' let's ask whether the man is brandishing or threatening anyone, and otherwise advise the caller that being armed is not a crime.

"And, particularly, let's stop shooting people who draw their guns when they're being assaulted. Yes, pausing those extra few seconds may sometimes put your own life in danger. This is still a less-dangerous job than hard-rock mining or fishing in Alaska, and you volunteered for it."

The right to keep and bear arms has been present in the US Constitution for over two centuries. It is time for the police to quit treating those who exercise it like criminals.

Posted by: Greg at 01:20 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I think the cops are wise to shoot first and ask questions later. I'd much rather see a couple gunlovers on the wrong side of the turf than a cop out doing his job. If you're dumb enough to pull a gun out when the cops are around, chances are you're not adding a whole lot of depth to the gene pool, anyhow.

Posted by: Dan at Thu Dec 8 05:30:47 2005 (lw0Ed)

2 Frankly, that about expresses my opinion of anti-war protesters -- shoot first and ask questions later. After all, why should the mere fact that one exercises a right under the Bill of Rights be the basis for letting those who are "not adding a whole lot of depth to the gene pool" continue to live?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Dec 8 07:32:44 2005 (2cQsg)

3 But then again, why should I be surprised by your position. Purveyors of all forms of socialism -- from Lenin to Stalin to Hitler to Mao -- have sought to disarm the populace so as to better allow for government control of those who would be free.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Dec 8 07:34:31 2005 (2cQsg)

4 Just jerking your chain a little there, RWR. I don't seriously support shooting gun nuts. And I'm not a socialist, either.

If you want to pull a gun on a cop, though, please get someone to update your blog with a final entry on where to send flowers. We'll miss you, and I promise I'll do a soul-stirring eulogy on my site about how you were a martyr for the Bill of Rights.

Posted by: Dan at Fri Dec 9 01:32:46 2005 (aSKj6)

5 Clearly you haven't bothered to read the article -- which was about police shootings of off-duty cops (minority off-duty cops in particular) and civilians defending themselves against criminal actions.

Drawing a weapon and taking aim at a cop is -- and should be -- an offense which results in the immediate application of the death penalty by the officer in question.

The possession and lawful use of a firearm should not be, though.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Dec 9 10:36:04 2005 (fI2Yv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0086, elapsed 0.0184 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0126 seconds, 34 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]