July 18, 2005

Natural Selection In Action

Will tusks disappear from elephants?

ELEPHANTS in China are evolving into an increasingly tuskless breed because poaching is changing the gene pool, according to new research by zoologists.

Up to 10 per cent of Asian elephants in China now have a gene that prevents them from developing tusks, up from the usual level of 2 per cent, academics at Beijing Normal University said.

Zhang Li, an associate professor of zoology, said: "The larger tusks the male elephant has, the more likely it will be shot by poachers.

"Therefore, the elephants without tusks survive, preserving the tuskless gene in the species."

Since only male elephants have tusks, there are now four female elephants for each male in China, up from the ideal ratio of two, Prof Zhang said.

Similar changes in elephants' tusk development and gender ratios have been reported in Africa and India, but China was not thought to have been as badly affected.

And for those of you who want to comment on evolution, go ahead. But let me note one simple fact for you -- this is, at best, a microevolutionary change, not a macroevolutionary one. After all, they are still clearly ELEPHANTS.

Posted by: Greg at 06:47 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I believe in evolution, but only when combined with intelligent design.

In other words; eyes, brains, wings, fingers, and the sense of smell didn't come from nowhere - it's from God's mind, and he made them grow.

When some idiot takes a fruit fly and makes it grow legs out of its head, and they point to it and call it evolution it makes me want to scream. Take that fruit fly and give it an advanced brain that is capable of independent and rational thought, an endoskeleton, an opposable thumb, and thermo imaging at a range of 200 yards, and I'll say it evolved...until then, it's just changed what it already had.

Bartleby

Posted by: Subjugator at Mon Jul 18 09:22:19 2005 (lkCzp)

2 Bartlyby, you are correct. Evolution, as it is now taught, should be banned from all textbooks. This country has been on the Godless road for too long, but it is not yet too late to turn back. We must, for our childrens sake.

Posted by: Richard at Tue Jul 19 13:44:53 2005 (YT+QW)

3 "Intelligent design" - a fancy way of saying 'I don't know 'cause it's too complicated to figure out, but it wasn't me.'

Posted by: Lovey at Wed Jul 20 05:00:43 2005 (fRt6P)

4 I would disagree -- ID calls for figuring out how the world works in a scientific fashion, but simply presumes a designer to go with the design of the universe which science illuminates.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Jul 20 07:14:31 2005 (MVe4c)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 2.6935, elapsed 2.6685 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.1918 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]