October 14, 2005

Laws Are For Little People

That seems to be the Kennedy family motto – whether they are laws regarding vehicular homicide, security checkpoints at airports, sexual assault, or environmental regulations.


Professed environmentalist Max Kennedy is due in court on the Cape today to answer chargeshe violated town conservation rules by clear-cutting a coastal bank on his Hyannisport property.

Kennedy, son of Ethel and the late Bobby Kennedy, was found responsible for cutting the vegetation in violation of restrictions the town Conservation Commission had set. He was assessed a $150 fine, which he did not pay, and he has to appear today for an arraignment.

``He is supposed to show up,'' said town conservation agent Darcy Karle. ``As a courtesy I contacted his attorney and told him that Mr. Kennedy needed to show up and pay the fine or a warrant for his arrest would be issued.''

Do we need to tell you this is not Kennedy's first run-in with the town conservation types? Kennedy, an avowed tree-hugger who formerly ran the Watershed Institute at Boston College and briefly flirted with a congressional run in 2001, was fined twice in 1998 for clearing brush and trees on his Cape property.

To build a touch-football field. Of course.

Kennedy is also currently in violation of wetlands protection laws for a pier he built off the back of his Maywood Avenue home. Karle said Kennedy constructed the pier without first submitting the proper paperwork, and that lights on the end of the dock are in violation.

Kennedy had asked for a hearing on Sept. 27 to answer to all the charges, then didn't show up.

Kennedy is currently under orders to replant shrubs on the bank and to remove the too-bright lights at the end of his pier. His attorney did not return our call. But do stay tuned . . . .

I guess such rules are only for the common people – but America’s royal family can get away with murder – and raping the land.

Posted by: Greg at 12:02 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 340 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Robert Kennedy Jr. was on O'Reilly over a year ago when Bill asked him why a set of windmills off that coast were opposed by the supposed "enlightened" community there. Was it a clear case of NIMBY?

"No," Kennedy replied. There "were other areas" where the windmills could be located! O'Reilly just shook his head laughing.

Posted by: Hube at Sat Oct 15 02:19:35 2005 (PQ2xq)

2 As for Mass., the best places for those windmills would be offshore where it's windy all of the time. "Enlightened" people they are not.

Posted by: mcconnell at Sun Oct 16 09:12:48 2005 (CQ3Yp)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
6kb generated in CPU 0.0044, elapsed 0.0109 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0082 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]