October 18, 2005

Gangs Planned Violence, Civil Rights Suppression

One ignorant Leftie commenter has accused me of racist stereotyping for daring to suggest that the riot in Toledo over the weekend was the work of black gangs.

Well guess what – the police in Toledo think so, too!

In the days leading up to the scheduled neo-Nazi rally in North Toledo, police gathered intelligence that gang members would be present and do something if they had the opportunity.

No specifics were mentioned, but police prepared for retaliation by gang members and their associates. They didn't plan for people to turn on the police.
"The intelligence indicated they were calling a peace among themselves and [would] show a unified front. They felt the Nazis were challenging them," police Deputy Chief Derrick Diggs said. "Why they looted, I can't answer that."
Police are still sorting through who was involved in the riot that followed a planned National Socialist Movement rally, which was canceled before it even started. Authorities have arrested 119 people since the riot, including some for violating the citywide curfew that was in effect until yesterday.

More arrests could follow as police view video taken by the department and from some businesses. They will review video from police vehicles and are asking the public and the media for any video footage they have.

While not everyone involved in the riot was a gang member, those who were gang members came from all over the city, authorities said. Various gang colors were seen on the streets.

So, does anyone want to speculate on the likelihood that said moonbat will offer me an apology? I’m willing to bet that the odds are about ZERO – and that he will accuse the police of racism for suggesting that these gangs, composed mostly of black males, even exist.

And notice, please, that the gangs cooperated for the specific purpose of violating the civil rights of a group that wanted to engage in constitutionally protected speech in a public place. Will any of the rioters face charges for these violations of the civil rights of the Nazis, as a gang of whites would if they tried to prevent a rally and march by black groups? Again, the odds are probably somewhere around ZERO.

And lest anyone complain that I am taking the side of the Nazis here, let me be very explicit. Nazis are scum – they are among the lowest of the low and I denounce them and their message. But in the end, they still have the rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Those who conspired to violate those rights are even lower than the Nazis, and deserve harsh punishment for their un-American activities.

Posted by: Greg at 11:50 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 452 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Greg: How can one have a legitimate conversation with someone who writes this:

I'd be really surprised if the people doing the rock throwing and car-burning weren't white. I personally don't know any black people brave/stupid enough to throw shit at the cops, because it's a good way to get yourself shot. Personally, I think taking advantage of white privilege to fight white racism has that "fucking sweet" ring to it.

Imagine someone saying, "Y'know, I'd be really surprised if the cops who beat the shit out of Rodney King weren't really black. I personally don't know any white cops stupid enough to beat up black suspects because it's a good way to ruin your life with with myriad lawsuits, a 'you're already guilty media' and no future career paths."

Sometimes you just gotta laugh, man....

Posted by: Hube at Tue Oct 18 13:55:15 2005 (9Eitc)

2 Yeah, you do have a point there, buddy.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Oct 18 14:00:59 2005 (wfdL5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0058, elapsed 0.0127 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0095 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]