October 17, 2005
"Before the first indictment you tried to coerce a guilty plea from Tom DeLay for a misdemeanor, stating the alternative was indictment for a felony which would require his stepping down as majority leader of the United States House of Representatives," DeGuerin wrote."He turned you down flat so you had him indicted, in spite of advice from others in your office that Tom DeLay had not committed any crime," the lawyer contended.
This sure makes it seem like Earle's filing was less about the evidence thanit was about his anger over being rebuffed by DeLay.
THe filings also include requests for the following:
- A speedy trial, because the indictments "have already had adverse collateral consequences including the temporary loss of Tom DeLay's leadership position in the United States Congress and an unknown effect on the upcoming (March 2006) primary election."- Dismissal of the indictments because, he contended, they failed to allege any act or omission by DeLay and improperly joined two offenses.
- Separation of DeLay's case from that of two political associates, because DeLay wants a speedy trial while the associates are pursuing appeals that would delay their cases.
Good Luck, Tom -- we here in District 22 are backing you on this one.
Posted by: Greg at
12:09 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Dan at Tue Oct 18 07:58:36 2005 (y9xzG)
Posted by: yahoo at Mon Sep 1 18:41:13 2008 (4lbdr)
Posted by: basher at Wed Sep 3 14:10:41 2008 (oquqE)
Posted by: basher at Wed Sep 3 14:14:27 2008 (PK1kx)
Posted by: basher at Wed Sep 3 15:35:41 2008 (axZVb)
Posted by: basher at Wed Sep 3 16:33:28 2008 (sYx4R)
Posted by: puppy at Thu Sep 4 06:46:28 2008 (ZTh+z)
Posted by: dog at Sun Sep 21 16:47:20 2008 (97ngI)
21 queries taking 0.0097 seconds, 37 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.