August 22, 2005

Does The Koran Qualify As Holy Scriptures?

There is a big dispute going on in the state of North Carolina over the use of the Koran for the taking of oaths in state courts.

Traditionally, witnesses taking the stand in court are sworn in by placing their hand on the Bible.

But when Muslims in Guilford County, N.C., tried to donate copies of the Koran for courtroom use, judges turned them down.

Chief District Court Judge Joseph Turner says taking an oath on the Koran is not allowed by North Carolina state law, which specifies that witnesses shall place their hands on the “holy scriptures,” which he interprets as the Christian Bible.

“We’ve been doing it that way for 200 years,” he said. “Until the legislature changes that law, I believe I have to do what I’ve been told to do in the statutes.”

But the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the American Civil Liberties Union are challenging the Guilford County Courts.

“This was the first time that we had a judge … going on record and stating unilaterally what is a holy scripture and what is not — what we believe to be a violation of the establishment clause,” said Arsalan Iftikhar of CAIR.

Fine, use it, though many of us consider the Koran to be (at most) one step above Satanic. But don’t expect it to receive any extra reverence in the courthouse – so when the menstruating female bailiff wearing a Star of David who just ate a BLT carries it in her bare hands for you to use, don’t go all jihadi on us.

Posted by: Greg at 01:08 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "Fine, use it, though many of us consider the Koran to be (at most) one step above Satanic."

Spoken like a true idiotic Xian.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Wed Aug 24 10:45:02 2005 (ODDFf)

2 What -- I'm supposed to think that Mohammad's little fantasy, which denies essential beliefs of the Christian faith while claiming to be a revelation from God, is something other than blasphemous and inspired by someone/thing other than God?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Aug 24 12:56:44 2005 (EnF98)

3 People could say that what Jesus spent the time in the wilderness is merely a delusional manner which he made out the stories. That his 13 disciples made the stories of miracles ... that the whole concept of Bible is just a story to tell. None of it is true.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Thu Aug 25 09:16:12 2005 (ODDFf)

4 Basically, I do not believe in Bible -- I do not think it is the Word of God. It was written by men who claimed to experience these "holy" craps -- but maybe they were schizophrenic to start with.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Thu Aug 25 09:17:20 2005 (ODDFf)

5 Well, Ridor, thanks for proving that you know nothing of the process by which Scripture was written and by which the various books came to be accepted as canonical. Your ignorance makes it easy to discount your words.

And even if your position had a shred of scholarly support, it would have no bearing on my assertion that those who accept the Bible would have reason to look at the Koran and view it as the product of infernal inspiration.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Aug 25 13:37:27 2005 (tfoe3)

6 Excuse me, that is what you think, RWR. I knew the bible thoroughly -- even more than many ministers can claim ... and I do not have to deal with your bullshit comments about the book that was often misinterpreted by many others.

Let's face the reality -- you're in Texas -- by itself, it is self-explanatory!

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Fri Aug 26 12:44:00 2005 (ODDFf)

7 Hah!

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Aug 26 13:45:38 2005 (R6+yj)

8 I'll wait for you to demonstrate some actual knowledge, because you have not done so yet.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Aug 26 13:47:33 2005 (R6+yj)

9 I'm still waiting, too.

Posted by: mcconnell at Sun Aug 28 09:40:16 2005 (x2noK)

10 The bibile is at best a series of allegories, not a book of "truth". So typical of the christian morons to think it is "the word of god".

Posted by: at Sat Sep 17 08:50:52 2005 (Sfcu+)

11 Would you care to supply some scholarly support for your discussion?

Or are you as braneless as you are gutless, you nameless coward?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 17 14:26:36 2005 (nkD2p)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
10kb generated in CPU 0.0039, elapsed 0.011 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0082 seconds, 40 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]