March 21, 2007

Anti-Semitic "Mainstream" Muslim Blogger

I just love it when Muslims, complaining about ill-treatment and so-called Islamophobia trot out their own anti-Semitism.

Guess what -- I've found a perfect example in this blogger.

Joe Sestak (D-PA) is facing an intense attack of sorts by the Philly Jews to back down from his commitment to speak at a CAIR dinner.

Come on, surely he could just come out and call them "kikes", given the tone of his opening.

And if you have any doubt of his anti-Semitism, consider what he has to say later on.

There is a lesson in this for all of usÂ… consider for a moment how this group of people are so beholden to a foreign country (Israel) that they do not mind There is a lesson in this for all of usÂ… consider for a moment how this group of people are so beholden to a foreign country (Israel) that they do not mind demanding the disenfranchisement of fellow Americans.

Ah, the anti-Semitic "dual loyalty" canard, trotted out to delegitimize the speech of Jewish-Americans -- what I think the author of the sentence would call an example of "demanding the disenfranchisement of fellow Americans" if it were used to criticize Muslim loyalty to the ummah above any other loyalty.

But then again, the author makes it really clear that he doesn't consider non-Muslims worthy of respect in another post -- especially if they are supportive of Israel.

“Our Muslim brothers”? First of all, we ain’t your brothers, especially YOUR brothers.

Contempt returned -- in spades.

Oh, and by the way, the only reason I found this blog is because it is being promoted by the Houston Chronicle's reader blog about Islam. It's author (a charming young woman with whom I have had a number of cordial and respectful discussions) claims to be "excited and happy" about this blog -- and is a co-blogger on the site in question, which makes me wonder if she has missed the anti-Semitism of at least one of her co-bloggers.

UPDATE -- 3/22/07: As you can see, Amad insists he was misunderstood. He even modified one portion of one of the posts in question, recognizing I may have had a point. After reflection, I'll presume good-will on his part, and that what he wrote did not have the intent I saw.

Posted by: Greg at 03:03 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 393 words, total size 3 kb.

1

Hi Rhymes!  I was glad to see you at MuslimMatters, and I figured you and Amad would be sparring again in no time.


Regarding your question about the perceived anti-Semitism on our blog...it's tough for me to respond - Amad is a very spirited and intense writer and I don't want to put words in his mouth by debating whether or not his comments are anti-Semitic. 


This group blogging is new to me and it will be interesting to see how it plays out - the group is an interesting mix of people and we won't always agree or express ourselves the same way.  Maintaining our blogging identities while staying true to the spirit of the blog will be a challenge but I have hope that God willing it will prove successful.


BTW, I'm sure you saw what the Chronicle has done with some of the readers blogs - sent them over to this chron.commons fiasco that I just can't adjust to.  I'm asking the blog editor to let me go back to the old platform (blogs.chron.com) and if you think it's a worthwhile thought, maybe you could let him know.  (I also have my own blog going at http://ruth-nasrullah.blogspot.com - thanks for letting me plug!)  And thanks for calling me "charming"!


Posted by: Ruth Nasrullah at Wed Mar 21 09:54:13 2007 (zJa3G)

2 I have already replied to your unfounded and unfortunate charges of antisemitism. I have dealt with Jewish people all my life and have had friends among them. So, not only are you complete off the mark, but your tactic is also quite despicable.

Secondly, your quote, "�Our Muslim brothers�? First of all, we ain�t your brothers, especially YOUR brothers." is another example of cut and paste half-truths. Not because you misquoted me but you did in fact misinterpreted me. The quote was directly targeted at Washington Times editors... the whole article was referring to them, how did that somehow become a generalization?

Finally, I live in this country as an American. I work with Americans, Americans work for me, and all of them are non-Muslims. I have friends among them, we eat out together, etc, etc. What we are protesting is the treatment of the bigots in this country to us Muslims. So, WE are the victims of this bias, not you. If you put yourself in our shoes, and what we are up against, you may appreciate what we say and when we say, keeping it in context all the while.

I hope we are able to maintain some of the mutual respect that I thought we had gained in past online meets.

Posted by: amad at Wed Mar 21 11:42:09 2007 (ffzJV)

3 Well, Amad, let me correct myself -- you only consider those of us who dare to support Israel to not be your brothers. And let me be clear -- I found absolutely nothing wrong with the editorial in question, and fully support Israel's right to exist and protect its citizens from those who would finish what Hitler started.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Mar 21 12:04:33 2007 (IZLqM)

4 Greg, you have to be more fair than that. It is not a question of supporting Israel, it is a question of not allowing others to voice their opinions, even when they are not talking about Israel. Do you recall Muslims having a protest meeting with any elected official to stop them from attending an ADL or a AIPAC function? At least I don't. And when I have been to CAIR events, they do not talk about foreign issues usually, 99% of their agenda is local civil rights. Why do you allow it to be colored by just one stance that you disagree with? Just like AIPAC has a right to support Israel's occupation, CAIR has a right to support Palestinian freedom. And I think we should support each other's right to express that opinion. The problem is not when you discuss this subject academically... the problem comes when either side starts throwing in unproven allegations and starts spinning the rumor-mill to damage the other's reputation. If CAIR was really a terrorist-linked organization, there would be hard evidence available or at least one indictment , right? Yes, there have been staffers who have been found guilty of 'support', but you cannot use a 'guilt by association' strategy to demonize the whole organization. You know as well as I do, that we cannot control the people who work for us, if we run any business or organization. Just like you cannot blame the Military for a few bad apples that mar its image.

Anyway, I can see that you want to be fair and sincere. I just hope you would start seeing what we are going through over here. Our civil liberties are at stake, and we cannot let the terrorist win by stripping freedom of speech and freedom of religion in this country from ANY of its countrymen. While you took offense to merely the slightest possibility (and unintended as we hopefully agree now) of anti-semitism... why don't you also stand up to the explicit Islamophobia that is rampant in the West. I don't think I need to provide you examples, because you are well aware of them. One way to make your views less colored, is whenever you see a situation which we see as Islamophobia, is to imagine a Jew instead of a Muslim in it, and then judge whether you would have considered that situation anti-semitic. If yes, then please afford Muslims the same thoughts.

Again, thanks for the update that you added.

Posted by: Amad at Thu Mar 22 03:17:40 2007 (KGoAr)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
12kb generated in CPU 0.0046, elapsed 0.0114 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0083 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]