June 10, 2004
After sodomy as a civil right and gay marriage by judicial fiat
why not this?
So, half the cops in a Utah town are Mormon Fundamentalists who practice polygamy. I'd be upset if the extension of a right to sexual privacy in Lawrence v. Texas didn't seem to give these folks the right to sleep with whoever they want. Similarly, the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts, if its logic is extended nationwide, would seem to preclude limiting marriage to only two people.
Calling all liberals -- what do you think? Is this what you had in mind?
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
So, half the cops in a Utah town are Mormon Fundamentalists who practice polygamy. I'd be upset if the extension of a right to sexual privacy in Lawrence v. Texas didn't seem to give these folks the right to sleep with whoever they want. Similarly, the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts, if its logic is extended nationwide, would seem to preclude limiting marriage to only two people.
Calling all liberals -- what do you think? Is this what you had in mind?
Posted by: Greg at
10:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
4kb generated in CPU 0.0059, elapsed 0.0131 seconds.
19 queries taking 0.0104 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
19 queries taking 0.0104 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.