January 01, 2008

A Message For Chuck Rosenthal

Withdraw.

Withdraw now.

You are not wanted on the GOP ballot.

And not just because of your tawdry affair and your continued inappropriate conduct with a staff member. After all, Bill Clinton established that it is perfectly acceptable for elected officials to use their staff to satisfy their own personal lusts. There would be no legitimate way for the Democrats to use it as an issue, especially if Hillary tops their national ticket. And while your conduct had already led me to decide that I would neither endorse you nor vote for you, I was open to your remaining on the primary ballot so that the Republican voters of Harris County could pass judgment upon your continued fitness (or unfitness) for office.

However, your comments in today's Houston Chronicle make it clear that you don't belong on the GOP primary ballot, nor on the general election ballot as the Republican nominee.

In a brief telephone interview Monday, Rosenthal acknowledged he told local TV news programs earlier in the day that the local Republican Party had never done much for him in his 2000 and 2004 election campaigns and that party leaders have become "Chicken Littles," unjustifiably fearful the scandal will damage the entire Republican roster of candidates in the county.

So your argument is that we didn't do much for you in 2000 or 2004. That's funny, I did literature drops for you. I put up signs. I called voters on your behalf. Glad to know that you don't consider that to be significant, s I won't make the mistake of doing it again.

But this also clarifies something quite important. You don't belong don't he GOP primary ballot, and you don't merit the GOP nomination. After all, the leadership of the Harris County GOP has made it clear that the Party does not want you. You have made it clear that you don't need us. That sounds like the grounds for an amicable divorce, which would take the form of you withdrawing from the primary and running as an independent.

After all, it isn't like you will be giving up anything that you consider to be a significant asset.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Stop the ACLU, Outside the Beltway, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, 123beta, Right Truth, Adam's Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, Nuke's, third world county, DragonLady's World, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Stageleft, Right Voices, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 04:23 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 425 words, total size 4 kb.

1 The problem is that there doesn't seem to be a suitable Republican Candidate that will run. Now there are some folks who believe party afiliationscs in some positions like DA or judgeships don't matter much. I might tend to agree but look who the Deomocrats have to offer up.Former Houston Police Dept. Chief C.O. Bradford is running against him as a Democrat. He was Mayor Lee P. Brown's Chief. Remember how great of as job he did then? Problem is the Republicans have no one else to offer. At least that I've heard so far. Republicans can't let one loser destroy the whole party. We let Delay shaft us last year to let Rosenthal do it to us again next year will be a crying shame.

Posted by: Liberty at Tue Jan 1 05:48:33 2008 (0XBwt)

2 Actually, old friend, I understand that there are at least four or five folks who have been approached and said they would consider a run against Rosenthal -- and several others who would jump in if he drops out. I know I suggested that Jim Squier drop his CD22 bid and run for DA instead -- he might have a shot there.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Jan 1 07:01:39 2008 (Ke9lM)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0126, elapsed 0.0238 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.017 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]