March 08, 2008
Since leaving office I've written about public policy from a new perspective: outside looking in. I've come to realize that protecting freedom of choice in our everyday lives is essential to maintaining a healthy civil society.Why do we think we are helping adult consumers by taking away their options? We don't take away cars because we don't like some people speeding. We allow state lotteries despite knowing some people are betting their grocery money. Everyone is exposed to economic risks of some kind. But we don't operate mindlessly in trying to smooth out every theoretical wrinkle in life.
The nature of freedom of choice is that some people will misuse their responsibility and hurt themselves in the process. We should do our best to educate them, but without diminishing choice for everyone else.
As McGovern points out, most folks who get payday loans and sub-prime mortgages do so with plenty of forethought and do not default on their loans. Why should the government limit or eliminate those options because of the few who do? Why should the government decide what health insurance options are available to the public, thereby pricing many folks out of the market completely (are you listening, Barack and Hillary -- McGovern sounds as if he likes the McCain plan)? Why doesn't the government trust the American people to make its own choices -- and allow those who make bad choices to suffer the consequences and learn from them?
MORE AT HotAir
Posted by: Greg at
05:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 330 words, total size 2 kb.
There are, of course, multiple occasions for sending out such greeting cards. After all, certain holidays have greeting card customs associated with them – Christmas being the most obvious example. However, birthday cards are also important because it tells the recipient that you have taken the time to learn about them as an individual and to not the special event. And by selecting an appropriate card, personalized with your business information, you associate the sense of good will with your business.

Personally, I’m fond of this card. You may ask why this one speaks out to me. Simple – who can resist a smile when one sees balloons? I personally find it tacky to send cards with gifts pictured on them unless you are sending a package along – but the balloons communicate the joy of birthdays past, especially from our childhood years.
Posted by: Greg at
04:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin says he is "a vagina-friendly Mayor."Nagin made the remark while welcoming the author of the Vagina Monlogues, Eve Ensler to the city to promote the "V-Day" celebration in New Orleans next month.
* * * Mayor Nagin began his comments at the news conference by saying, "How am I gonna stand up and say, I'm a 'vagina-friendly' Mayor to these cameras after 'Chocolate City' and some of the other stuff that I've done. But you know what? I'm in."
Unfortunately, though, Nagin is saying that in the context of endorsing a play that endorses sexual molestation of under-age girls as a liberating experience. Far from promoting the event, I'd argue that he should be condemning it. But that's just my opinion.
And let me offer this observation -- I'm no speech writer, but it seems to me that there are two sentences that should never be used together in the same paragraph.
"I'm a 'vagina-friendly' Mayor."
and
"I'm in."
And I say that as someone who is proud to be "vagina-friendly" (the friendlier the better, in my opinion).
H/T Michelle Malkin, Protein Wisdom
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Rosemary's Thoughts, 123beta, Oblogatory Anecdotes, Big Dog's Weblog, The Amboy Times, Pursuing Holiness, Adeline and Hazel, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, third world county, Nuke Gingrich, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
03:52 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Greg at
03:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
Family Massacre Casts Pall Over Town
One would think that this sort of brutal murder of a family -- perpetrated by a group of local teens, including one of the children of the family -- would have quite an impact on this small town. And certainly the article itself is beautifully written (unusual for the AP), I just can't get past that dumb headline.
Posted by: Greg at
03:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
March 07, 2008
Take, for example, the Dymo LabelWriter line that is designed for business use. Each of these printers has a number of great features, allowing you to print different types and sizes of labels needed for your business. Indeed, the printing speed is fantastic – for example, the LabelWriter 400 Turbo has the capacity to spit out 55 labels in a minute – nearly one a second. That is just plain amazing! And not only that, you can print a href="http://global.dymo.com/enUS/Home/default.html">online stamps on the LabelWriters using the No-Monthly-Fee DYMO Stamps™ postage labels that are made for these printers. That saves you from having to deal with stamps – just print your own postage from a USB printer hooked to your computer!
Posted by: Greg at
07:37 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 2 kb.
| Votes | Council link |
|---|---|
| 3 1/3 | Chicago Rules Big Lizards |
| 2 2/3 | The Rape of Rape On American Campuses Cheat Seeking Missiles |
| 2 2/3 | The Dershowitz Questions Wolf Howling |
| 1 2/3 | Exchange Student Woes The Colossus of Rhodey |
| 2/3 | Rape Bookworm Room |
| 1/3 | Ending the War in Iraq The Glittering Eye |
| 1/3 | The Terrorism Conundrum for Democrats Right Wing Nut House |
| 1/3 | The Fine Art of Flying (with the president) Soccer Dad |
| Votes | Non-council link |
|---|---|
| 2 2/3 | Dissecting the 60 Minutes Scandal Power Line |
| 2 | Why Don't Jews Like the Christians Who Like Them? City Journal |
| 1 1/3 | Defending Against Terror Impossible In International Law Elder of Ziyon |
| 1 1/3 | Inside Iraqi politics -- Part 5. A Look At Legislative Progress: SunnisÂ’ and StatesÂ’ Rights The Long War Journal |
| 1 1/3 | Think Happy Thoughts About People Who Want to Kill You! Breath of the Beast |
| 1 | Maybe in the Future Things Will Be Different? Dr. Sanity |
| 2/3 | Not to Complicate Matters, But... The Chronicle of Higher Education |
| 2/3 | Redeeming the Old Stereotypes Classical Values |
| 2/3 | Title: A Shot Across the Bow Dodgeblogium |
| 1/3 | Blogging While Female: 5 Conservative Women Bloggers Talk About Gender Issues and the Blogosphere Right Wing News |
Posted by: Greg at
05:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 4 kb.
March 06, 2008
New York state has fined the personal corporation of Democratic Senate candidate Al Franken $25,000 for not carrying workers'-compensation insurance for almost three years.The New York Workers' Compensation Board levied the fine against Alan Franken Inc. in August 2006 for failure to carry the insurance from June 2002 to March 2005.
Brian Keegan, a board spokesman, said a number of notices were sent to the address the New York agency had listed for Franken. But the TV personality and liberal political commentator didn't become aware of the fine until Tuesday, said campaign spokesman Andy Barr.
Three years of failure to pay for the insurance, and 18 months of failing to pay the fine. Could you imagine the media outrage – and left-wing rants – if this were Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity? But the outcry of the MSM chatterers and liberal pols has been quite subdued. After all, it is one of their own who has been caught.
Posted by: Greg at
09:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
A teen who used vulgar slang in an Internet blog to complain about school administrators shouldn't have been punished by the school, her lawyer told a federal appeals court.But a lawyer for the Burlington, Conn., school told the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday that administrators should be allowed to act if such comments are made on the Web.
Avery Doninger, 17, claims officials at Lewis S. Mills High School violated her free speech rights when they barred her from serving on the student council because of what she wrote from her home computer.
In her Internet journal, Doninger said officials were canceling the school's annual Jamfest, which is similar to a battle of the bands contest. The event, which she helped coordinate, was rescheduled.
According to the lawsuit, she wrote: "'Jamfest' is canceled due to douchebags in central office," and also referred to an administrator who was "pissed off."
After discovering the blog entry, school officials refused to allow Doninger to run for re-election as class secretary. Doninger won anyway with write-in votes, but was not allowed to serve.
A lower federal court had supported the school. U.S. District Judge Mark Kravitz, denying Doninger's request for an injunction, said he believed she could be punished for writing in a blog because the blog addressed school issues and was likely to be read by other students.
Now I wrote extensively about this case some months ago, and really believe Kravitz dropped the ball here. After all, no one could plausibly argue that the school could impose this sort of ban on her had she appeared on a radio talk show or been interviewed for a television news show and made similar statements. The First Amendment would clearly apply in such a manner as to prohibit the district from taking action against Avery. Similarly, a blog post made from home on personal equipment outside of school hours cannot reasonably be seen as rising to the level of disruptiveness that could possibly justify allowing to school to reach out and punish Avery for a potential disruption of school – especially when the blog post was not discovered for several weeks after it was made and it could be clearly determined that there had been no disruption caused beyond district officials having to field a few extra phone calls and emails from members of the taxpaying public in regards to the operation of the district’s schools.
And most frightening, Judge Kravitz even acknowledged that what Avery had done was to engage in political speech seeking the redress of grievances – something protected explicitly by the Constitution.
My analysis from September still stands.
But let's consider the judge's opinion itself (34 pages long, yet miraculously issued a mere 45 minutes after closing arguments!).In the opinion, Judge Kravitz states that the internet presents new challenges for school administrators, and that the courts have yet to fully shape the boundaries of school authority when it relates to the Internet. But in his recitation of the facts of the case, Judge Kravitz makes one important factual concession that shows his decision to be wrong.
Avery, J.E., P.A., and T.F. decided to send an email to various taxpayers, informing them of the situation and requesting that they contact the school superintendent, Paula Schwartz, in the LMHS central office to demand that Jamfest be held in the auditorium on April 28.This email, which urges the public to contact public officials on a matter related to the operation of a public school, clearly qualifies as political speech. And given that Avery's later posting on her LiveJournal site reproduced the email in its entirety, it is virtually impossible to argue that the LiveJournal post does not similarly constitute political speech -- and it is that post which was used as the basis to prevent Avery from seeking reelection to her class officer position AND which later led the school to refuse to count write-in votes for her and to attempt to hide the ballots and the vote tally when repeated FOIA requests were made for them.
Now the judge conflates the standards found in the Morse and Fraser cases to argue that the school's action is justified in this case because the speech was disrespectful, uncivil, and potentially disruptive (despite the fact it took place away from school, the judge ruled that Internet speech can be treated as on-campus speech if any member of the school community can read it). But in doing so, he ignores Justice Alito's concurring opinion in the Morse case, which essentially controls and limits the reach of school authority in cases of political speech.
I join the opinion of the Court on the understanding that. . . (b) it provides no support for any restriction of speech that can plausibly be interpreted as commenting on any political or social issue. . . .As such, the most recent Supreme Court decision regarding student speech, which Judge Kravitz uses to permit the school to take action against Avery Doninger, clearly prohibits the school from doing so. And given that the standard in Tinker requires the speech to cause a substantial disruption before it can be suppressed, A side-by-side reading of the two decisions must lead to the conclusion that the school's actions were wrong.
As for the application of the Fraser standard, it needs to be remembered that the lewd sexual language in that case occurred in a middle school auditorium, before a captive audience of students. No one can maintain that the facts here are even remotely similar. Calling an administrator a "douchbag" on a webpage might be uncivil, rude, and (arguably) inappropriate, but no one who does not voluntarily access the page is exposed to that message -- and it is possible to prevent any disruption caused by blocking the page from the school computers. The facts simply do not fit with the Fraser precedent.
In light of that analysis, I'd go further. Judge Kravitz cites a series of cases in which courts have held that students have no right to participate in extracurricular activities. While I am generally in agreement with him, I think the reasonable application of the Tinker and Morse standards is necessary here. If, in fact, students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate, and if schools may not restrict political speech, then it is absurd to argue that a student might be banned from extracurricular activities for their speech on political or social issues. No rational legal scholar would argue, for example, that the Tinker children could not be suspended or expelled for the black armbands but could be denied a place in the school band, on an athletic team, or in student government for that same anti-war speech. No judge would rule that an administrator could bar a student who maintained a blog that commented against abortion or in favor of gay rights from membership on the debate team or the chess club. And more to the point, it would be seen as frighteningly un-American if a school district were to impose an extracurricular ban upon students who maintained a website opposing a school bond issue.
And quite frankly, the judge probably needs to consider the Supreme Court ruling in Cohens v. California as well. If the word "fuck" is protected speech in a political context, it is impossible to argue that "douchbag" (or its correctly spelled version) does not maintain similar protected status -- especially given that no action was taken against a student who posted a comment on the blog referring to the district superintendent BY NAME as a "dirty whore".
Another issue to consider is the fact that Judge Kravitz has ruled that speech on the Internet can be considered on-campus speech if it relates to school and students can see it at any time, including while at home using their privately-owned computers. This treats the Internet in a manner different from any other media, and essentially exempts it from First Amendment protection. I seriously doubt, for example, that Judge Kravitz would have ruled that Avery's use of the word "douchbag" on a picket picket-sign on a public sidewalk in front of the administration building during a protest of the cancellation of Jamfest could be treated as on-campus speech, even if students passing by on vehicles saw the sign. Similarly, were the protest covered by the news media, photos or video of such a sign in the press coverage could not convert her speech into an on-campus disruption of the educational process. Neither would placing signs in her yard, posters in public places, or an ad in the local newspaper. And were she to write a column on the issue that appeared in the press -- perhaps in a local alternative newspaper -- I cannot imagine any judge declaring her use of the word "douchbag" to be on-campus speech merely because a fellow student could read it. On what legitimate basis does the judge treat the Internet differently and place it beyond First Amendment protection under Tinker, Fraser, and Morse?
At this point, the only individuals directly harmed by this decision are Avery Doninger and the students who wrote her name in during the class election (incidentally, she won the office according to a tally of the ballots when they were eventually obtained under the states FOIA). And yet the speech of every student in her school is chilled by the decision allowing even a temporary victory to the officious administrative douchebags who chose to make an example out of her for her exercise of her First Amendment rights in her home using her own computer outside of school hours. But the potential for damage to the First Amendment rights of every American student is even greater. Judge Kravitz's decision must be overturned.
Indeed, IÂ’d argue that the need to overturn the decision is even more critical now. The school board is now arguing that it has the right to regulate student speech on the Internet precisely because it is a larger forum and can be used more effectively by students to communicate with each other and the public! Rather than preparing students to be citizens of a free society, this district is inculcating the values of a totalitarian countries like Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Red China which punish their enslaved subjects for speaking out against their dictatorial regimes.
The case has been covered extensively, exhaustively and comprehensively at The Cool Justice Report.
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT The Virtuous Republic, Nuke Gingrich, Allie is Wired, Right Truth, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Global American Discourse, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, , CORSARI D'ITALIA, Conservative Cat, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1815 words, total size 13 kb.
March 05, 2008
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) kicks off his general-election campaign trailing both potential Democratic nominees in hypothetical matchups, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) leads McCain, who captured the delegates needed to claim the Republican nomination Tuesday night, by 12 percentage points among all adults in the poll; Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) holds a six-point lead over the GOP nominee. Both Democrats are buoyed by moderates and independents when going head to head with McCain and benefit from sustained negative public assessments of President Bush and the war in Iraq.
The problem with this poll? First, it is eight months before the election. A lot can happen in that time, and will certainly include plenty of in-fighting among Democrats in this bitter race. Expect some of their supporters to peel away as that continues. Second, there will be the nomination of VP candidates, which can also blunt concerns about McCain's age while possibly exacerbating the Clinton/Obama split among Democrats. And then there is simply the tightening of the race that is inevitable as we see both sides get more balanced amounts of press coverage. So while i don't like these numbers, they don't necessarily frighten me.
Posted by: Greg at
11:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
I remember those words in ads when I began my first job search years ago, fresh out of college. But let’s be honest – I didn’t have any experience, and I didn’t see how I could have gotten any while working on my degree. After all, that degree was supposed to be the key to getting that first job and acquiring that experience – right?
What I didn’t realize was that there had been opportunities during my college career to apply for internships in my chosen field and thereby get some of that much-desired work experience. I would have been much more marketable if I had. And if you fast forward two decades into today’s world, you will find that the same dynamic is at work – and that internships are even more important for students who are graduating and seeking that first job.
The Internship Institute is a program devoted to helping students with the College Recruiting and post-collegiate employment experience by making internships more readily available and more standardized in terms of their content. And since such internships are becoming a graduation requirement at more and more colleges, they are proposing that one half of the tuition paid by college students for their internships be set aside to create internship readiness centers, thereby closing the gap between school and work. Check out the proposal at their website, located at http://www.internshipinstitute.org/.
Posted by: Greg at
11:19 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 236 words, total size 2 kb.
A former Navy sailor was convicted Wednesday of leaking details about ship movements to suspected terrorism supporters, an act that could have endangered his own crewmates. Jurors convicted Hassan Abu-Jihaad, 32, of Phoenix of providing material support to terrorists and disclosing classified national defense information on the second day of deliberations.The American-born Muslim convert formerly known as Paul R. Hall faces up to 25 years in federal prison when he is sentenced in May. His attorney, Dan LaBelle, said an appeal was likely.
"We're disappointed with the verdict, but we respect the process. It was a close case," LaBelle said.
Reached by telephone Wednesday afternoon, a juror called the case "difficult" and said there was plenty of debate in two days of deliberations.
"It was a very, very difficult decision to make," said the juror, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of the case. "It was not something that was clear cut. When we concluded, there was not a doubt in our mind."
There is a word for what this guy did. It is called treason -- giving aid and comfort to the enemy during time of war. There is simply no excuse for not charging him with that crime, and then imposing the proper penalty. The failure of the Bush Administration to seek treason charges against jihadis -- whether this piece of pig-crap or the American Taliban -- is really inexcusable. It undermines the reality that we are at war with the enemy we face by promoting the perception of something less.
Posted by: Greg at
11:18 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
Take, for example, this site that I recently ran across. It does a great job of mixing the efficiency of the internet with the human need to find enjoyable sustenance. For example, at the Restaurant Calgary site I found a large listing of restaurants that are conveniently situated on the siteÂ’s the digital map. Using that map, you can easy to find where a particular restaurant is located.
Similarly, on the Restaurant Vancouver site you can locate any number of fine dining establishments by use of the digital map. All you have to do is determine the type of cuisine, the style of dining, and the part of town where you will be dining and you can find exactly the sort of restaurant you want. So, for example, the next time I visit my folks and we make a day trip up to Vancouver, we can just hit the internet and find an Italian restaurant with reasonable prices and a spectacular view. You know – things that out-of-towners don’t usually know about but that can be key to making a fine dining experience.
You get the same sort of convenience at the Restaurant Toronto site. Just choose which the relevant categories, part of town, and amenities to narrow the search. Once you find that special restaurant, then you can find the details of the restaurantÂ’s location so you can get there conveniently.
Posted by: Greg at
11:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 2 kb.
New York City police officers and firefighters cordoned off much of Times Square after an explosion — possibly set off by a human-made device — rocked the front of the Armed Forces Recruiting Station on the traffic island bounded by 43rd and 44th Streets, Seventh Avenue and Broadway around 4 a.m.No injuries were immediately reported. A city official confirmed that the explosion occurred and that police had cordoned off the area as a precaution to ensure that there was no secondary device; the official emphasized that there was no reason to believe that any additional devices had been planted.
I just heard a TV report that someone was spotted riding away on a bicycle after throwing a device at the recruiting station. No arrests yet, but it will be interesting to see if there is a claim of responsibility. My personal thought is that this probably makes the perps "Code Pink types", since any self-respecting jihadi would have blown himself up during daylight hours to take out as many innocents as possible. The fact you have a coward fleeing the scene on an environmentally-friendly means of transportation when there was no one around makes it appear to be the tactics of the Left -- though still treasonous terrorism.
Posted by: Greg at
11:12 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Greg at
11:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
More on them later.
First the news.
Patrick Swayze’s doctor is “optimistic” about his prognosis for battling pancreatic cancer, and the “Dirty Dancing” actor’s upcoming cable pilot is still in contention to become a series.With the writer’s strike over, the A&E pilot “The Beast,” starring Swayze as an unorthodox FBI agent, is being considered to be turned into a series by the cable network. If that happens, the “Dirty Dancing” and “Ghost” star hopes to continue to be part of the show, his representative Annett Wolf told The Associated Press on Wednesday.
Swayze has been undergoing treatment for the disease, Wolf confirmed in a statement. The National Cancer Institute estimates there will be 37,680 new cases of pancreatic cancer in 2008 with 34,290 deaths in the U.S.; only five percent of patients live more than five years after being diagnosed.
No, things do not look good for Swayze, though he certainly will have access to the best treatment. The reality, though, is that every person I've known with pancreatic cancer has been gone within a year. It is particularly virulent.
So why do i comment on the story? Two reasons.
1) While folks remember Ghost and Dirty Dancing when talking about Patrict Swayze, a pair of chick flicks, most guys remember him best in a favorite film of the Cold War era, Red Dawn. It is strange to watch the movie today, with the Russians no longer Communist and Castro gone from power in Cuba, but it still resonates. I wonder -- could a similar film about a post-Islamist takeover of America ever get made today?
2) I always have enjoyed the outrageous headlines of the NY Post, but they crossed a line with this one.
PATRICK SWAYZE GOING TO DIE
Come on, folks, isn't that a bit much? Have you no decency? And I won't point out the obvious truth that goes along with your headline.
Posted by: Greg at
10:58 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 341 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Greg at
06:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
On Monday, February 25, 2008, my wife and I were returning to Houston after visiting my wifeÂ’s hometown, where we were seeing to her mother, who is seriously ill and expected to pass away soon. It was a difficult time.Because my wife, Paula, uses a wheelchair, we needed to access the private screening lane at approximately 10:00 a.m. As instructed by the TSA staff member at the podium at the head of the line, we placed our personal property on the lower shelf of the metal table so that I could push Paula down to the private screening room and then return to place these items on the x-ray belt. It was important to stay with these items because they included a wallet with approximately $100 in it, a personal laptop computer, a cellular phone, my wifeÂ’s purse and a carry-on bag containing a number of collector coins and some jewelry that PaulaÂ’s mother wished her to have, as well as both of our medications. We were carrying these latter items in the carry-on bag out of concern that they would disappear from checked baggage.
We first encountered the screener named Monique at this time. She was carrying a number of gray plastic crates to place in position for travelers to use. I told Monique that I did not want these items going through screening without me because of the valuables inside the bag, and that the previous TSA employee had told us that we could place the items there. Monique told us that we could not do so. When I reiterated my first statement, Monique said, "You're going to do it my way" and began to move the items to the x-ray conveyor and push the items through the x-ray without my permission. I was upset because this meant these items would have to sit at the end of the x-ray unattended until I could get my wife to the private screening room and then pass through the line myself.
During this time, Monique passed by PaulaÂ’s wheelchair several times, striking her in the back with the gray bins each time she passed. We at first assumed this was an accident but came to believe that this was intentional because of the repeated act of striking her in the back as she passed.
At this point Monique insisted Paula move her wheelchair. It is a motorized wheelchair, but no battery was connected because we considered the difficulty of traveling with them to outweigh the benefits. Paula could not move her wheelchair by herself because of her disability, so I needed to move the wheelchair for her to the screening room. Monique was angered by this, and was upset that my wife could not get out of her way fast enough to suit her or reach the screening room unattended. We were disturbed when we reached the private screening room and discovered it would be Monique who was to conduct PaulaÂ’s screening. According to Paula, Monique repeatedly kicked and hit her chair when she asked her to stop because the jarring of the chair caused her great pain due to chronic pain associated with her disability. Paula further states that another female screener was in the room when Monique conducted her screening and became so visibly upset by Monique actions and verbal abuse that the female screener left the room.
After screening was completed, Monique informed Paula that she needed to conduct a bag search on the bag containing the coins, jewelry, and medication. Monique was angry that Paula did not have the bag to the small padlock on the bag and continued to be very rude and abrupt. During the search, MoniqueÂ’s rudeness continued in my presence, and inquired why we were carrying certain of the items. I stated, "Lady I don't know what your problem is," to which Monique responded, "I'm no lady." In reply, I said, "No you're not, but I'm not going to say what I think you are". At that point, Monique aggressively responded "You want to start calling names? You want to start calling names?" Her manner was unprofessional and of such an aggressive, confrontational nature, that I believed Monique was trying to provoke a fight in order to have me arrested. I would also like to state that I do not believe it was her business to ask why we had medication, coins and jewelry in our carry-on luggage.
Monique summoned a man named Ron, and Paula and I indicated that we wanted to file a complaint. Ron started to hand us two sheets of paper, but then gave us only one. The form Paula was given by Ron did not have a place to include our names and contact information, which left us concerned about follow through. Paula completed the form we were given in detail, and I then turned the information in at the podium, though I do not remember the name of the woman to whom it was given. We then headed to the gate for our flight.
After arriving at the gate, I went to one of the magazine stands to get a soda for Paula so that she could take her medication due to the pain caused by MoniqueÂ’s jarring of the wheelchair and her back. A female TSA employee, who turned out to be the same woman who left the private screening room, approached me. She expressed her concern over the way Paula was treated and was aware that we were not provided with the Customer Service Representative's name and telephone number. She provided us with the Customer Service number and contact information. She stated that she had taken her break and followed us because the treatment we had received was not right, and that Monique constantly treats passengers this way but is never disciplined because someone seems to be either covering for her or afraid to take action, despite the fact that Monique is often rude and or brutal with passengers. She related that there have been past incidents that involved physical altercations with passengers, and no action taken, and she asked us to please follow up on our complaint, which was already our intent. She was quite concerned with having her anonymity concerned, however, because of the lack of action against Monique and fear that she would face retaliation (including possible termination) for assisting us in this way. I view her actions as being in the highest spirit of professionalism and to be commended rather than punished.
I have since been in contact with the Pittsburgh Customer Service Representative, and have initiated a complaint process through her, as well as with my elected representatives in Washington, DC.
I'll be the first to concede that airport security is important. That said, such treatment is not necessary, and is clearly an abuse of authority. I'll keep you folks posted on the outcome of the process I have initiated as it moves along.
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, third world county, McCain Blogs, The World According to Carl, Shadowscope, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, Celebrity Smack, Leaning Straight Up, Cao's Blog, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, CORSARI D'ITALIA, Adeline and Hazel, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
01:45 PM
| Comments (213)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1264 words, total size 9 kb.
March 04, 2008
I do, of course, comparison shop for insurance, even though IÂ’ve been content with my insurance company -- every year I compare auto insurance rates to find out if I am really getting the best available deal, as well as for the insurance on my house. That can be a time-consuming task, though, checking with different companies to determine what the best available rates are and then comparing the different bells and whistles of each.
Over at Autonetinsurance.co.uk, you can find some really great deals on all types of insurance. This includes Business Insurance of all types. As I compared what they had to offer, I was surprised to see how low the rates could be. So if you are located in the UK, why donÂ’t you drop by their site and see if they can save you some money on the insurance that you need. After all, what have you got to lose except the higher price you are paying now?
Posted by: Greg at
11:36 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 1 kb.
Brett Favre told Green Bay Packers officials yesterday that he is walking away after a 17-year career in which he established himself as one of the most prolific and charismatic quarterbacks in NFL history.Favre, 38, had pondered retirement in each of the last few offseasons but chose to continue a career that's sure to land him in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, even when it seemed as if his best days as a player might be behind him. He reversed the downward spiral in his play this past season, recapturing the exuberance and daring success of his younger days and leading the Packers to the doorstep of another Super Bowl appearance.
That resurgence on a youthful team created the expectation that he was likely to return next season. Instead, he informed Packers Coach Mike McCarthy by telephone Monday night that he would retire and reiterated that plan in a phone conversation yesterday morning with General Manager Ted Thompson.
Frankly, this is a good choice. The man doesn't feel ready to continue with the physically and mentally grueling effort that he needs to put out to excel. Better to allow a younger man to step in and lead the team to the next level than to pull the packers down by a halfhearted effort. We've all seen what happens when a great player over-stays his welcome. I'm glad Favre won't be a player remembered that way.
Posted by: Greg at
11:24 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Greg at
11:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
On the other hand, Hillary Clinton turned the Democrat race for the White House upside down with her victories in both of the big jewels in yesterday's primaries, Texas and Ohio.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton defeated Senator Barack Obama in Ohio and Texas on Tuesday, ending a string of defeats and allowing her to soldier on in a Democratic presidential nomination race that now seems unlikely to end any time soon.Mrs. Clinton also won Rhode Island, while Mr. Obama won in Vermont. But the results mean that Mrs. Clinton won the two states she most needed to keep her candidacy alive.
Her victory in Texas was razor thin and came only after most Americans had gone to bed. But by winning decisively in Ohio earlier in the evening, Mrs. Clinton was able to deliver a televised victory speech in time for the late-night news. And the result there allowed her to cast Tuesday as the beginning of a comeback even though she stood a good chance of gaining no ground against Mr. Obama in the hunt for delegates.
“No candidate in recent history — Democratic or Republican — has won the White House without winning the Ohio primary,” Mrs. Clinton, of New York, said at a rally in Columbus, Ohio. “We all know that if we want a Democratic president, we need a Democratic nominee who can win Democratic states just like Ohio.”
On the Republican side, Senator John McCain swept to victory in Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas and Vermont and claimed his partyÂ’s nomination, capping a remarkable comeback in his second bid for the presidency.
Mr. McCainÂ’s main remaining rival, Mike Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas, announced he was dropping out minutes after the polls closed and pledged his cooperation to Mr. McCain. Aides to Mr. McCain said he would head Wednesday morning to Washington to go to the White House and accept the endorsement of President Bush, his one-time foe, and begin gathering his party around him.
Let's be clear about what this means -- Barack Obama just saw his cake walk to the nomination ended. Hillary CLinton now has a very realistic possibility of surviving all the way through to the Democrat convention, which is quite likely to be brokered. There is absolutely no telling what that will mean -- however, I'd have to say the institutional support the Clintons have makes it more likely that she will win the nomination through the decisions of the super delegates.
Expect increasingly bitter rhetoric from both Obama and Clinton over teh next few weeks -- and expect the eventual nominee to emerge from the process bloodied and an easier target for John McCain and the Republicans.
Posted by: Greg at
11:11 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 510 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Greg at
06:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
March 02, 2008
The two programs, for older Americans and low-income people, cost $627 billion last year and accounted for 23 percent of all federal spending. With no change in existing law, the Congressional Budget Office says, that cost will double in 10 years and the programs will account for more than 30 percent of the budget.Economists and health policy experts say the federal health programs are unsustainable in their current form, because they are growing much faster than the economy or the revenues used to finance them. The Medicare program is especially endangered; its hospital insurance trust fund is expected to run out of money in 11 years.
But the need for cutbacks is not a popular theme for political candidates wooing voters who want more care at a lower cost.
The Democrats do not say, in any detail, how they would slow the growth of Medicare and Medicaid or what they think about the main policy options: rationing care, raising taxes, cutting payments to providers or requiring beneficiaries to pay more.
So, Hillary and Barack, what are you going to do to Grandma and Great-Uncle Sid? Provide them less care? Make them pay more of their fixed incomes for medical treatment? Raise everyone's directly taxes to pay for them? Cut payments to medical providers so that the rest of us pay a hidden tax in terms of increased fees when we see a doctor? And how will you prevent these same pitfalls from entering into your universal health care schemes, bringing us higher costs or rationed medical care?
After all, the American people deserve to know before you sell us a bill of goods.
Posted by: Greg at
11:20 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 308 words, total size 2 kb.
But it isnÂ’t just a cataclysmic event like a Category 5 hurricane barreling towards your home that home insurance covers. It also covers liability for those hurt on your property.
Home insurance costs very depending on issues like the level of the deductible and what is covered by the policy. Home insurance policies, for example, often exclude claims regarding “Acts of God”, floods, and earthquakes. In such cases you need to get a rider or a separate policy to cover such exclusions. Be sure to understand what risks are included under your policy and what are not, and then adjust your coverage accordingly.
You can also get insurance if you are a renter to cover the contents of your apartment and liability issues. In the case of such insurance policies, make sure that you get the same sort of protection against disasters and other events that may occur and cause you a loss.
Posted by: Greg at
11:13 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 217 words, total size 1 kb.
A U.S. military helicopter fired a guided missile to kill a wanted al-Qaida in Iraq leader from Saudi Arabia who was responsible for the bombing deaths of five American soldiers, a spokesman said Sunday.U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Gregory Smith said Jar Allah, also known as Abu Yasir al-Saudi, and another Saudi known only as Hamdan, were both killed Wednesday in Mosul.
According to the military, al-Saudi conducted numerous attacks against Iraqi and U.S. forces, including a Jan. 28 bomb attack that killed the five U.S. soldiers.
In that attack, insurgents blasted a U.S. patrol with a roadside bomb and showered survivors with gunfire from a mosque. The soldiers died in the explosion, the deadliest on American forces since six soldiers perished Jan. 9 in a booby-trapped house north of Baghdad.
Intelligence gathered in the Mosul area led the U.S. military to al-Saudi, who was in a car with Hamdan. A precision helicopter strike killed both and destroyed their vehicle. U.S. forces then confirmed the men's identities.
Smith said their deaths brought to 142 the number of al-Qaida insurgents killed or captured in Mosul since the end of January.
Remember -- these are the Islamist swine who are murdering American servicemen in the name of Muhammad. They are making war on the United States, and so we have rightly given war right back to them -- so don't ask why we didn't simply capture them and put them on trial. The reality of war is that you kill the enemy, not arrest him and give him a lawyer.
Oh, and Senator Obama -- please note that al-Qaeda is in Iraq. Your proposed withdrawal of American troops would therefore violate your insistence that American troops would fight in Iraq if al-Qaeda was there.
Posted by: Greg at
11:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.
Venezuela and Ecuador have ordered troops to their borders with Colombia, raising concerns of a broader conflict after Colombia killed a top rebel leader on Ecuadorean soil.Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Sunday promised Venezuela would respond militarily if Colombia violates its border, where he ordered tanks as well as thousands of troops. He also ordered closed Venezuela's embassy in Bogota.
Ecuador's president, Rafael Correa, called for the troop deployment while also withdrawing his government's ambassador from Bogota and expelling Colombia's top diplomat.
''There is no justification,'' Correa said Sunday night, snubbing an earlier announcement from Colombia that it would apologize for the incursion by its military.
Chavez called the killing of rebel leader and spokesman Raul Reyes and 16 other rebels on Saturday an attack by a ''terrorist state.''
I can understand Ecuador's concerns -- except, of course, for the fact that Ecuador has provided safe haven for FARC for years, just like the Colombians. But Venezuela has been actively interfering in Colombia's internal affairs on behalf of the rebels for some time now. These same nations would certainly take action within Colombia were they under constant assault by rebels based there, so the level of hypocrisy is astounding.
For its own security, Colombia must crush FARC. If that requires tangling with the state-sponsors of terrorism on its borders, then that is justified. Here's hoping that Hugo Chavez has bitten off more than he can chew.
MORE AT HotAir
Posted by: Greg at
11:00 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
But since I work in a neighborhood with lots of folks of lower socio-economic status, I have any number of students who come from families of relatively small means, and that was the way in which I first learned about the reality that is the payday loan. I mean, from time to time I hear about families facing the possibility of having the lights shut off or the car taken back because they simply don't have the cash to make a payment right now. In situations like that, a payday loan can be the difference between having what they need and losing what they have because they just donÂ’t have the money today.
That's why the companies that provide such loans exist. WhatÂ’s more, with the advent of the internet it is now possible for people to get a payday loan online. So while we all know it is better not to have such a need, it is good to know that there are options that exist to help meet those short-term financial needs when those needs exist. And you can even get such loans online without having to submit materials by fax, because at Easy Online Payday Loan they have a completely faxless payday loan.
Posted by: Greg at
06:16 PM
| Comments (229)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 1 kb.
Steinem raised McCain’s Vietnam imprisonment as she sought to highlight an alleged gender-based media bias against Clinton.“Suppose John McCain had been Joan McCain and Joan McCain had got captured, shot down and been a POW for eight years. [The media would ask], ‘What did you do wrong to get captured? What terrible things did you do while you were there as a captive for eight years?’” Steinem said, to laughter from the audience.
McCain was, in fact, a prisoner of war for around five-and-a-half years, during which time he was tortured repeatedly. Referring to his time in captivity, Steinem said with bewilderment, “I mean, hello? This is supposed to be a qualification to be president? I don’t think so.”
Let's set aside the fact that this malignant old bitch is wrong about the reaction of the media -- when we have had female POWs they have been treated with respect and adulation and their sacrifices have been honored.
And that this wrinkled old crone and her audience would find the respect given Senator McCain and the 5 1/2 years of torture he endured bewildering and funny (note the laughter) is indicative of how far in to the depths of anti-Americanism the Democrats have sunk. She certainly is not worthy of breathing the same air as John McCain.
But then again, why should we be surprised. She was one of those out on the front lines of the anti-war movement in the 1960s and 1970s, calling heroes like John McCain baby-killers and murderers. She is more supportive of America's jihadi enemies today than she is of the US, and she has more sympathy for the jihadis getting fat at Gitmo than she ever had for Americans starved and tortured by our nation's enemies. And she is a supporter of Hillary Clinton. -- one who indicates that she could be quite happy with Barack Obama because they are at least 90% the same on the issues.
The Clinton campaign has made a weak attempt to distance itself from Steinem's comments. The Obama campaign has remained shamefully silent. Those of us who love America and respect her men and women in uniform will remember this incident.
More at HolyCoast, Nick Ragone, Forum Politics, Shoe-Fly Pie, American Princess, Paxalles.
UPDATE: HotAir has more -- including Wes Clark's denigration of McCain's military service, in which he places time as First Lady ahead of time as a military officer in terms of preparation to lead the nation.
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Rosemary's Thoughts, 123beta, Right Truth, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Cao's Blog, Conservative Cat, , Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, Wake Up America, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Wolf Pangloss, , Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, Stageleft, Gone Hollywood, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
02:34 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 502 words, total size 6 kb.
Tony Rezko was obviously in trouble. He was a defendant in at least a dozen lawsuits, federal investigators in Chicago were poking around, and his name was in newspaper articles about corruption and fraud.None of that stopped Mr. Rezko, a politically connected developer, and Senator Barack Obama from completing real estate deals a few years ago that resulted in the Obamas obtaining their dream house and the Rezkos buying an empty lot next door.
Nearly three years later, fallout from Mr. ObamaÂ’s relationship with Mr. Rezko, who raised more than $150,000 for Mr. ObamaÂ’s campaigns, continue to dog Mr. Obama on the presidential campaign trail. That distraction promises to linger as Mr. Rezko goes on trial on corruption charges starting Monday.
Mr. Obama, a Democrat, is not part of the case against Mr. Rezko, who is accused of shaking down companies seeking business with the State of Illinois. Mr. Obama has conceded that it was a mistake to bring Mr. Rezko into his personal real estate dealings, although he has insisted that there was nothing unusual about the developerÂ’s decision to buy a sought-after lot in an upscale neighborhood.
But a review of court records, including new details of Mr. RezkoÂ’s finances that emerged recently, show that the lot purchase occurred as he was being pursued by creditors seeking more than $10 million, deepening the mystery of why he would plunge into a real estate investment whose biggest beneficiary appears to have been Mr. Obama.
As Mr. Obama and Mr. Rezko were completing the property purchases in June 2005, Mr. Rezko was fighting to keep lenders and investors at bay over defaulted loans and failing business ventures. But he side-stepped that financial dragnet by arranging for the land to be bought in his wifeÂ’s name, making it the only property she owned by herself, according to land records.
As a result, when the Obamas bought part of the land from Mrs. Rezko seven months later to widen their yard, the money they paid was beyond the reach of Mr. RezkoÂ’s creditors, including one conducting a court-ordered hunt for his assets to recover a $3.5 million debt.
Politics of change? Yeah -- keeping a nice chunk of change in the hands of a corrupt crony and out of the hands of those he defrauded.
But this is Barack Obama -- he's young, he's hip, he's cute, and he's Democrat. We dare not look too closely at this deal between him and a corrupt businessman -- especially because we don't know what skeletons will come tumbling out of the closets back in Chicago, where corruption is the oil that keeps the Democrat machine rolling.
And so while the Daley Administration running Chicago and the Blagojevich Administration running Illinois are tarred by their associations with Rezko, we are somehow expected to believe that Barack Obama is the only politician who somehow remained above the sleaze, despite this sweetheart deal and the long association between the two.
All it requires is that one suspend rational thought until November.
Posted by: Greg at
11:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 539 words, total size 3 kb.
Barely a year into the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suggested buying slaves for $400 apiece under a "gradual emancipation" plan that would bring peace at less cost than several months of hostilities.The proposal was outlined in one of 72 letters penned by Lincoln that ended up in the University of Rochester's archives, which are now online.
In a letter to Illinois Sen. James McDougall dated March 14, 1862, Lincoln laid out the cost to the nation's coffers of his "emancipation with compensation" proposal.
Paying slaveholders $400 for each of the 1,798 slaves in Delaware listed in the 1860 Census, he wrote, would come to $719,200 at a time when the war was soaking up $2 million a day. Buying the freedom of an estimated 432,622 slaves in Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri and Washington, D.C., would cost $173,048,800 — nearly equal to the estimated $174 million needed to wage war for 87 days, he added.
The idea never took root. Six months later, Lincoln issued the first of two executive orders known as the Emancipation Proclamation that declared an end to slavery.
This would have eliminated the need to pass the Thirteenth Amendment -- slavery would have been at an end in the territory controlled by the United States. Would the Confederacy have responded positively to this development and perhaps considered peace and a return to the Union? Or would the war have continued on?
Of course, it is important to note that none of what Lincoln proposed would have ended the peculiar institution for those enslaved in the bulk of the South. It would not have ended the Civil War. And instead of dollars, America paid a high price in blood to end an evil that had been allowed to infect the nation for too long.
Posted by: Greg at
11:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 328 words, total size 2 kb.
Southbelt-Ellington Leader
February 24, 2008
PublisherÂ’s Opinion
ItÂ’s probably not necessary to remind our readers that election day is right around the corner, and everyone should vote.
There is plenty of information available to encourage you to vote for specific candidates. The Leader is not going to endorse candidates at this point.
But there is one candidate in a race, the congressional race for the 22nd District, for whom we are going to urge people not to vote for. That candidate is Pete Olson.
In May of 2007, he quit his job in Washington, D.C.
He left his $700,000 home to buy a house in Fort Bend for approximately $185,000 in August of 2007. At that time, he reported his mailing address as his home in Virginia.
When he filed with the Republican Party in December to run for the local congressional seat, he was asked how long he lived in the state, county and district.
Olson reported he lived in the state, county and district for four months.
Olson thinks he can use the big bucks he is getting from lobbyists to buy our congressional seat.
In his third campaign filing period, he reported receiving $175,000; with 90 percent of his funds coming from out of the state of Texas, most of it from well-known lobbyists.
He avoided his fellow opponents in the one televised debate, telling Channel 13, he was declining attending the event.
LetÂ’s see, home base really in Virginia; living in Texas for a few months out of the last couple of decades and most of his campaign money being donated from out of state.
Seems clear to me.
If elected, when his constituents want something for the district, they are going to have to get behind the long line of out-of state lobbyists.
He canÂ’t have, in such a short time, learned what he needs to know about representing this community.
Sorry, Mr. Olson, you must earn our vote, not buy it with out-of-state dollars from big lobbyists.
– Marie Flickinger
Well said, Marie. The problem with Olson is that his roots in the district are incredibly attenuated, and his position in the race is owed to those from outside of the area -- and the state -- who are financing his race. We deserve better.
Posted by: Greg at
11:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.
| Votes | Council link |
|---|---|
| 3 | In A PC Nation, How Will The GOP Run? Cheat Seeking Missiles |
| 2 | Find the Adjectives Soccer Dad |
| 2 | Obama (with links) & McCain's Petard Wolf Howling |
| 1 2/3 | Unforced Errors The Glittering Eye |
| 2/3 | The Pursuit of Happiness Bookworm Room |
| 2/3 | "I'd rather be with God against man than with man against God..." Joshuapundit |
| 2/3 | Still At Risk: The Shocking Ignorance of Our Young Right Wing Nut House |
| 1/3 | Packer on Iraq Done With Mirrors |
| Votes | Non-council link |
|---|---|
| 2 2/3 | To Die in Jerusalem, Part II My Shrapnel |
| 2 1/3 | The Fierce Urgency of Lies American Thinker |
| 1 1/3 | Guns in the Desert Michael J. Totten |
| 1 | Bobby Kennedy and Why Obama Unnerves Me Roger L. Simon |
| 1 | Validating AGW Skepticism The QandO Blog |
| 2/3 | The Democrats' Collective Cognitive Catatonia Dr. Sanity |
| 2/3 | DoD News Briefing with Col. James from Iraq GlobalSecurity.org |
| 2/3 | Greece and Rome in Iraq Kings of War |
| 1/3 | 15 Years: The World Trade Center Bombing Michelle Malkin |
| 1/3 | Obama Logic Versus Racial Preferences National Journal |
I neither nominated nor voted this past week due to the recent family and health issues that I wrote about yesterday. Here's hoping that things remain settled enough in the days to come that I will be able to do both.
Posted by: Greg at
10:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 5 kb.
March 01, 2008
HereÂ’s how this works. You know, of course, that when you add a keyword the major search engines eventually index it, and create internal links within your website. These pages, automatically created as a part of the normal process of maintaining your site, will contain videos, links, images and text to match your chosen keywords. Select 50 keywords and you end up with 50 high-quality pages already optimized for the search engines. The result is that you can use Happar.com for all your money needs regarding your website. And For members support, just visit their forum. They even have a great affiliate program, so you can start making money that way as well.
Posted by: Greg at
06:12 PM
| Comments (30)
| Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
Got pennies!It's plastered on their shirts and these eighth graders wear it proudly because on Thursday they pulled a prank at the Readington Middle School, paying for their lunches entirely in pennies.
"At first it started out as a joke, then everyone else started saying we're protesting against like how short our lunch is," student Alyssa Concannon said.
Several lunch ladies who had to do the counting didn't think it was funny, even though some of the students put the coins in rolls. They're not authorized to put in their two cents but school officials say they felt disrespected and other students didn't get to eat lunch.
"There are ways to express yourself that are not disruptive to other kids and disrespectful to staff," said Readington Superintendent of Schools Dr. Jorden Schiff.
Eighth grader Jenny Hunt said in hindsight, the prank may have been a bad idea.
"Maybe we should have thought before we did it," Hunt said.
In fact, the penny prank has earned 29 students two days of detention.
Now I will grant that 5800 pennies is a bit of a nuisance -- but given that the pennies are legal tender, I don't know where a public school can refuse them in payment or punish their use. Especially since some of the students in question even brought them neatly rolled.
And I'm curious -- will the principal now dictate that all lunches be paid for with two crisp, non-sequential one dollar bills?
Posted by: Greg at
04:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
It is an odd, disquieting fact at times. After all, such a discrepancy in regard to any other demographic sub-group would be taken as prima facie evidence of invidious discrimination and mandate serious affirmative action remedies.
According to statistics recently released by the National Education Association (NEA), men made up just 24.4 percent of the total number of teachers in 2006. In fact, the number of male public school teachers in the U.S. has hit a record 40-year low. Arkansas, at 17.5 percent, and Mississippi, with 17.7 percent, have the lowest percentage of male teachers, while Kansas, at 33.3 percent, and Oregon, with 31.4 percent, boast the largest percentage of men leading the classroom.
Let's look at those numbers. Men are represented in the classroom at only 50% of their percentage in the general public nationwide -- and in some states the under-representation rises as high as 65%. Why would that be?
Why the downward trend in male teaching? According to Bryan Nelson, founder of MenTeach, a nonprofit organization dedicated to recruiting male teachers, research suggests three key reasons for the shortage of male teachers: low status and pay, the perception that teaching is "women's work," and the fear of accusation of child abuse.
You have that right, folks. Men are still expected to be the main breadwinner in this society, but we teachers are really not paid enough to do that. The perception of teaching as "women's work" is real -- and often fostered by female teachers and administrator in the lower grades, as well as female professors of education (and some of their neutered male colleagues) who seek to elevate "female" notions of cooperation and collaboration over "male" values like competition and individual achievement. And don't forget the minor detail that any man is presumed to be a sexual predator under modern notions of feminism.
What no one wants to look at is the reality that there actually is discrimination against men who want to go into education, especially in the lower grades.
For men thinking of heading into education, Nelson offered hard-won advice: Be persistent. Get practical experience first. Look for resources to help you get through school, and, when applying for a job, make sure you have thick skin."People will ask you inappropriate questions," he said, recalling a recent e-mail he received from an aspiring male teacher who was asked during a job interview, "Why would any healthy male want to work with kids?"
In such situations, Nelson suggests stressing the positive aspects of having a man in the classroom. "When kids see [a man] in front of them on a daily basis, it helps to contradict negative stereotypes," Nelson said.
The magnificent Dr. Helen sums up my reaction to that little bit of "wisdom" from an ADVOCATE for men in the classroom.
So men are told to get a thick skin, get used to handling "inappropriate questions," and learn to contradict negative sterotypes. In other words, if men are discriminated against, it is up to them to deal with the fall-out and to change negative steroptypes and to expect no help from other people. So men are guilty unless proven otherwise.
Dear God -- it is 2008! No one would dream of asking why a "normal" woman or minority would want to be a doctor, lawyer, or President of the United States. What is going on when we are getting the same sort of questions about the normalcy of a man who wants to work with children?
Personal experience on the matter? I've been on the receiving end of the anti-male discrimination. I can point to it 20 years ago. Having completed all but my comprehensive exams for my master's degrees, I found myself work at the start of a school year. A local Catholic school was advertising for a teacher's aide to help teach reading classes. I interviewed for the position -- and was turned down. Four weeks later I got a call from the school offering me the position. I later learned that two women without college degrees had been hired and let go before I, the sole remaining applicant (who was already certified in secondary education), was offered the job.
Shortly after Christmas, I began talking with the two teachers with whom I worked about seeking elementary education certification -- and was discouraged, despite the high praise they gave me for my work with our first and second grade students. After raising the issue a few more times over the next several weeks with some of the other teachers, I was summoned to the office of the principal and informed that I should give up my "silly notions" of teaching on the elementary level -- and that she would see to it that I received no positive recommendations for either the local university elementary education program or any elementary school because "men do not belong in an elementary classroom." A few days later I was informed that my position was to be eliminated at the end of the school year -- but interestingly enough, an identical position was created the following fall and given to a female parishioner without a college degree.
And I won't get into the question of sexual abuse allegations. I've ranted about that one in the past, about seeing male colleagues victimized by false accusations while actual female perpetrators are given light sentences because their actual misconduct is seen as not as severe as the same deeds committed by a man.
Having said all that, I want to mention one positive sign -- and one close to my heart. Last spring, I met up with a former student at the district administration building. I'd lost contact with this young man, an old favorite of mine, after he graduated from high school. I was pleasantly surprised to see he was wearing an ID card from one of the other schools in the district -- and that he was teaching fourth grade. Even better, that spring he was named the rookie teacher of the year at his school. I know it is a little thing, but that this young man made the choice to teach tells me that there are others out there who will follow if our society makes it clear that male teachers -- and teachers in general -- are something that we value.
By the way, kudos to Hube for noting that the media seems intent upon ignoring this story. And thanks to Soccer Dad for contacting us both about the issue.
Posted by: Greg at
12:23 PM
| Comments (325)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1139 words, total size 7 kb.
Obama then got the answer just as colossally wrong.
Playing on anxieties about national security, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has produced a “red phone moment” advertisement that suggests she would be better able to respond to a crisis than Senator Barack Obama.“It’s 3 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep,” says a narrator as threatening music surges over dark black-and-white images.
There’s a world crisis and the White House phone is ringing. “Your vote will decide who answers that call,” the narrator says. “Whether it’s someone who already knows the world’s leaders, knows the military — someone tested and ready to lead in a dangerous world.”
It ends with a photo of Mrs. Clinton wearing glasses and picking up the phone.
Mr. Obama, responding to the ad during a stop in Houston, said it raised “a perfectly legitimate question.”
But let's be honest here -- the presidential candidate who is best qualified to pick up that phone is not Hillary Clinton. It is Senator John McCain, whose experience in and knowledge of the United States military is head and shoulders superior to that of either Democrat.
McCain knows, from personal experience, the cost of an incorrect decision to use -- or not use -- military force in defense of the United States. Neither of the Democrats has such experience. Neither of them has children currently serving in the US military.
McCain knows those world leaders, too -- and has greater experience with and greater respect from those leaders. After all, he has been in a policymaking role for decades, not making good-will visits and hosting state dinners as First Lady or voting present in a state legislature.
Who do I want picking up that phone at 3 a.m.? Who should any American want taking that call?
A neophyte politician -- long on rhetorical skills but short on qualifications?
A woman who loathes the military and who is seeking high public office the old-fashioned way -- using her husband's coattails to obscure her own lack of accomplishments?
Or a bona fide military hero from a family that has served the nation in the United States military with distinction for generations?
The answer should be obvious -- and I respectfully question the wisdom of anyone who disagrees.
OPEN TRACKBACKING ATOutside the Beltway, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Rosemary's Thoughts, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, Woman Honor Thyself, Right Truth, The World According to Carl, Shadowscope, Pirate's Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Oblogatory Anecdotes, Leaning Straight Up, Cao's Blog, A Newt One, Conservative Cat, Right Voices, The Yankee Sailor, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
04:38 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 461 words, total size 5 kb.
Another reason for the sharp hike in food prices is the increasing demand for ethanol, which has driven up the price of corn – and at the same time created a shortage of wheat as farmers shift their crop to the more lucrative corn.
Yes, I know that the article is pointing to higher gas prices as the source of much of the price increases in foods like pizza, beer, hot dogs, and such things -- but imagine what will happen whe we start seeing a federal mandate for increased use of "renewable" ethanol as a fuel source More corn production will lead to less wheat production which will lead to higher prices for anything that uses flour -- you know stuff like bread.
Are the Greenies really sure that ethanol is a bright idea now? What will they say when they can't afford to buy a loaf of organic bread to make their staving children tofu and jelly sandwich?
Posted by: Greg at
04:09 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
After completing two tours in Iraq, Sgt. Wayne Leyde won $1 million from a scratch-and-win lotto ticket on Tuesday.Now that he's won, Leyde, a 26-year-old member of the Washington National Guard, says he's still going to volunteer to go back to Iraq for a third tour and won't spend any of the money in the meantime.
* * * Leyde couldn't believe it when he scratched a winning ticket, but he still plans to return to Iraq.
"It was a commitment I made about three months ago. I'm going to stick to it," Leyde said about his decision.
The sergeant says rents have gone sky high where he and his parents live in the Mount Spokane area of Washington and that, for now, he's not going to spend any of the money.
"For right now, I'm going to hold off [spending] and let reality sink back to earth. This is a true blessing. I'm going to turn it around and see if I can bless other people with this," Leyde said.
This soldier could possibly get out of the military at this point. He could almost certainly defer his deployment to a war zone. He is doing neither, as he views the mission in Iraq as important to our nation and to the Iraqi people. My hat is off to Sgt. Wayne Leyde.
Posted by: Greg at
04:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 1 kb.
For the first time in the nationÂ’s history, more than one in 100 American adults is behind bars, according to a new report.Nationwide, the prison population grew by 25,000 last year, bringing it to almost 1.6 million. Another 723,000 people are in local jails. The number of American adults is about 230 million, meaning that one in every 99.1 adults is behind bars.
But wait. If these folks are, in fact, committing real crimes against real people, it strikes me that this is a good thing. I want the violent folks, the thieves, and the drunk drivers off the streets.
Question: What does 1 in 100 Americans behind bars mean?Answer: That the other 99 of us are safer. Look the reason so many black men are behind bars is that so many black people are beat up, raped or murdered by black men. When one-eighth of the population suffers nearly half the nationÂ’s homicides, the problem is not that so many members of that eighth are behind bars, but that you suffer so many homicides.
The black men who should be saved are not the ones behind bars but the ones in coffins.
IÂ’m tired of my students being crime victims. IÂ’m tired of their relatives being crime victims. LetÂ’s start worrying about the victims instead of the victimizers.
Posted by: Greg at
03:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
79 queries taking 0.5602 seconds, 1072 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.













