Over at Blogs for Bush, Mark Noonan offers this for our consideration.

For your consideration and debate:

US Civil War: first time there is a Republican President - very large, Democratic anti-war movement.

Spanish/American War: Republican President - very large, Democratic anti-war movement.

World War One: Democratic President - no anti-war movement.

World War Two: Democratic President - no anti-war movement.

Korean War: Democratic President - no anti-war movement.

Vietnam War: As soon as a Republican took over the botched war from the Democrats - very large, Democraitc anti-war movement.

Last Ten Years of the Cold War: Republican Preisdent - very large, Democratic anti-war movement.

Gulf War: Republican President - very large, Democratic anti-war movement.

Kosovo War: Democratic President - no anti-war movement.

War on Terrorism: Republican President - very large, Democratic anti-war movement.

Discuss: what are we to make of this clear pattern of Democrats opposing any war they are not in charge of?

My personal thought on the matter -- Democrats consider the votes of their fellow citizens to be more dangerous than the bullets and bombs of enemies of America who seek to defeat and destroy our country. It is therefore more important that the elected representatives of the American people be defeated, rather than the enemy in the field.

Posted by: Greg at 03:07 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 221 words, total size 2 kb.

Are you looking to increase your hits and generate more revenue? Then you need Apogee Search for Paid Search Management. Apogee will help you discover what keywords and phrases bring traffic to your site, boosting your rankings and increasing your profit. And best of all, Apogee Search is now Google AdWords certified!

Paid Endorsement.

Posted by: Greg at 06:00 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.

What sort of person does this to a puppy?

Two teenagers accused of duct-taping a puppy's snout and paws and cooking the animal alive in an oven pleaded guilty Friday to animal cruelty and other offenses.

Prosecutors said Joshua Moulder, 17, and his brother, Justin, 19, broke into a newly refurbished community center, where they tortured and killed the 3-month-old puppy, damaged computers, broke glass and splattered paint on the walls.

The brothers then brought neighborhood children to see the dead puppy and threatened to kill them if they reported it, prosecutors said.

They will be sentenced next month.

Give them the max -- to be served consecutively.

Then publish the date, time, and location of their release on the internet.

And to all folks with an ounce of decency and even a sliver of a soul, never forget those names -- Joshua Moulder and Justin Moulder. May they be shunned from human society in perpetuity.

UPDATE: I received the following email tonight, with information related to this crime.

I run a blog on the case about the Atlanta "baked puppy" case that you posted about yesterday. I was wondering if you would consider putting up the address of the District Attorney so that people can mail letters supporting the maximum sentence for these criminals. Letters will go the judge (they should be addressed to Judge Thelma Wyatt Moore) but should be sent to:

Assistant DA Laura Janssen
Office of the Fulton County DA
136 Pryor Street, SW--Third Floor
Atlanta, GA 30303

We're just desperate to have people write letters as soon as possible because the sentencing is scheduled for February 9th--not a lot of time. Also, we have composed a form letter so people don't even need to write their own. It can be downloaded here: http://media6.filewind.com/g.php?filepath=5526.

I urge folks to act appropriately. To learn more about the case, you can visit the blog referenced above.

Posted by: Greg at 02:54 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.

This is the guy who oversaw the destruction of an ancient Afghan cultural treasure, a part of the world heritage of all humanity. I hope Satan had a warm spot reserved for him.

A FORMER Taleban official who oversaw the destruction of the 1,500-year-old Bamiyan Buddhas in 2001 was assassinated in Afghanistan yesterday.

Maulavi Mohammed Islam Mohammadi, who was the Taleban's governor of Bamiyan province when the giant fifth-century statues were blown up in March 2001, was killed on his way to Friday prayers in the capital, Kabul.

Frankly, he was one of those I would have liked to see receive justice before an international court -- but I'll concede this is an acceptable substitute.

Posted by: Greg at 02:48 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.

Come on -- do you mean the editor didn't consider this opening paragraph just a little bit over the top?

WELLINGTON, N.Z. (AP) - New Zealanders' love affair with sheep gained official recognition Friday when the agriculture minister declared Feb. 15 "National Lamb Day."

The date selected marks the 125th anniversary of the first shipment of frozen meat from New Zealand to London.

Posted by: Greg at 01:23 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.

The NFL promotes tailgate parties at every stadium in the league. Indeed, it is one of the attractions of the gameday experience.

But at the Super Bowl this year, tailgating is banned – even at venues not part of the stadium complex, including private property.

Die-hard football fans attending the Super Bowl game at Dolphin Stadium are getting a rude awakening after finding out that no tailgating of any type will be allowed on game day within one mile of the stadium.

"There is no tailgating allowed in the Dolphin Stadium parking lots," Sue Jaquez, a member of the Super Bowl XLI Host Committee, confirmed on Tuesday. "And there is no tailgating anywhere within a one-mile radius of the stadium." "And there are no RVs allowed."

* * *

Detective Nelda Fonticella of the Miami-Dade Police confirmed the Super Bowl rules.

If caught grilling or consuming alcohol within that one-mile radius of Dolphins Stadium, fans initially "will be warned and asked to pick up their things and leave," Fonticella said. "We're trying to make this a pleasant experience for everyone, and there will be plenty to do in the week leading up to the game."

I can understand the on-site issues – but banning tailgating at off-site venues seems to be a bit of a draconian approach.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, The Random Yak, Adam's Blog, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Phastidio.net, Cao's Blog, The Amboy Times, 123 Beta, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, stikNstein... has no mercy, The Uncooperative Blogger ®, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 10:22 AM | Comments (28) | Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 4 kb.

My first thought was to check the whereabouts of my Aggie friends at the time of the crime.

Suspects questioned in Bevo rape and beating

No, Longhorn fans, your mascot is safe – I forgot that in St. Louis “Bevo” is one of the neighborhoods.

And on a serious note, let’s all hope that the police nail the perps in this horrific crime.

Posted by: Greg at 10:20 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

My first thought was to check the whereabouts of my Aggie friends at the time of the crime.

Suspects questioned in Bevo rape and beating

No, Longhorn fans, your mascot is safe – I forgot that in St. Louis “Bevo” is one of the neighborhoods.

And on a serious note, letÂ’s all hope that the police nail the perps in this horrific crime.

Posted by: Greg at 10:20 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.

After all, it isn’t that liberal talk radio is suppressed – it is that it isn’t commercially viable.

Al Franken, Randi Rhodes and Sam Seeder — articulate liberal pundits — don't sell well, even in Santa Cruz.

The trio are part of the nationally syndicated Air America, which was dropped from Santa Cruz radio station KOMY 1340 AM on Thursday and replaced with music from the 1950s, '60s and '70s.

The left-leaning radio network, aimed at taking on Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk shows, debuted on Central Coast airwaves in July 2005, but local advertisers never bought in, station owner Michael Zwerling said.

"We didn't sell a single ad in a year and a half," Zwerling said Thursday. "I thought liberal radio would work as a viable advertising business in the most liberal town in America. I was wrong"

Santa Cruz isn't the only place Air America has problems. The network is struggling nationwide and filed for bankruptcy four months ago.

Zwerling put Air America on the air as an alternative to the Limbaugh program, which plays on KOMY's sister station KSCO 1080 AM every morning.

Limbaugh is a major moneymaker for the station, Zwerling said, and his show pulls the highest ratings of any program on KSCO or KOMY.

So let’s look at this. You’ve got a station owner offering both points of view, using different stations to do so. One format flops, while the other is hugely successful. Does it make any sort of sense to require that the station owner continue to broadcast what no one wants to listen to? And notice, please, that this is a very blue part of a blue state where liberal talk has failed – if they can’t make it there, can they make it anywhere?

What this shows is that the reason for the lack of diversity on talk radio is not that stations won’t book the format for political reasons – it is because they cannot find an audience for the format. Any attempt to require that viewpoint be aired is nothing short of suppression of the speech that people want to hear in favor of that they reject. How is that in the public interest?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, The Random Yak, Adam's Blog, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Phastidio.net, Cao's Blog, The Amboy Times, 123 Beta, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, stikNstein... has no mercy, The Uncooperative Blogger ®, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 10:18 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 5 kb.

After all, it isn’t that liberal talk radio is suppressed – it is that it isn’t commercially viable.

Al Franken, Randi Rhodes and Sam Seeder — articulate liberal pundits — don't sell well, even in Santa Cruz.

The trio are part of the nationally syndicated Air America, which was dropped from Santa Cruz radio station KOMY 1340 AM on Thursday and replaced with music from the 1950s, '60s and '70s.

The left-leaning radio network, aimed at taking on Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk shows, debuted on Central Coast airwaves in July 2005, but local advertisers never bought in, station owner Michael Zwerling said.

"We didn't sell a single ad in a year and a half," Zwerling said Thursday. "I thought liberal radio would work as a viable advertising business in the most liberal town in America. I was wrong"

Santa Cruz isn't the only place Air America has problems. The network is struggling nationwide and filed for bankruptcy four months ago.

Zwerling put Air America on the air as an alternative to the Limbaugh program, which plays on KOMY's sister station KSCO 1080 AM every morning.

Limbaugh is a major moneymaker for the station, Zwerling said, and his show pulls the highest ratings of any program on KSCO or KOMY.

So let’s look at this. You’ve got a station owner offering both points of view, using different stations to do so. One format flops, while the other is hugely successful. Does it make any sort of sense to require that the station owner continue to broadcast what no one wants to listen to? And notice, please, that this is a very blue part of a blue state where liberal talk has failed – if they can’t make it there, can they make it anywhere?

What this shows is that the reason for the lack of diversity on talk radio is not that stations won’t book the format for political reasons – it is because they cannot find an audience for the format. Any attempt to require that viewpoint be aired is nothing short of suppression of the speech that people want to hear in favor of that they reject. How is that in the public interest?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, The Random Yak, Adam's Blog, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Phastidio.net, Cao's Blog, The Amboy Times, 123 Beta, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, stikNstein... has no mercy, The Uncooperative Blogger ®, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 10:18 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 459 words, total size 5 kb.

My only reaction to this headline is “No shit!”

Teens shouldn't text and drive, study warns

And neither should anyone else. Duh!

And to think that someone paid good money to find out what anyone with a lick of common sense could have told them.

Posted by: Greg at 10:15 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.

I've written more than once about the pathetic excuse for an educational institution that is Texas Southern University. It isn't that there are not good people there -- I acknowledge that there are -- but rather that the powers that be have run the place without any regard to principles of sound management or ethics. That is how the school finds itself in constant financial difficulty.

But for some reason -- I suspect a desire not to give offense to the African-American community by closing the historically black institution (it began some six decades ago as the Texas State University for Negroes, in an attempt to stave off desegregation at UT & Texas A&M) -- Gov. Rick Perry has ordered the Regents (who have shown themselves incompetent to oversee the operation of the school) to develop a plan to get the school on sound financial footing.

Startled by the depth of Texas Southern University's multimillion-dollar financial woes, Gov. Rick Perry has ordered its board of regents to start making "tough decisions" to fix the problems or resign.

"It can't be a Mickey Mouse deal," Perry spokesman Robert Black told the Houston Chronicle on Thursday. "It can't be a Band-Aid."

In private meetings last week, Perry demanded that TSU's regents come up with a concrete plan within 30-45 days to start fixing problems plaguing the university's finances this year.

Next week, the terms of three of TSU's nine regents expire, giving Perry the opportunity to name new members.

Perry also plans to announce a blue-ribbon panel that will develop a long-term plan for TSU, including defining its academic mission.

One fear, which the governor's office said it hopes to avoid, is that TSU would be merged into another university.

Houston Democrats Sen. Rodney Ellis and Rep. Garnet Coleman underscored the importance of protecting the historically black university and keeping it independent. They noted its long history in shaping Houston's black middle class.

"TSU is in the neighborhood where I grew up. It isn't just an institution I represent," Coleman said. "It's more than that. TSU represents some of the best of black Texas and black Houston."

Ellis said he is a graduate of the university, along with political notables including the late U.S. Reps. Barbara Jordan and Mickey Leland and lawyer and former U.S. Congressman Craig Washington.

I know it would be nice to keep the school open, but we can do better by the students of this institution. It is walking distance to the University of Houston, and so I again suggest that the time has come to merge the two schools and place TSU in the University of Houston system. Just as Prairie View was merged into the Texas A&M system and saw great strides made in the years that followed, the same would be true of TSU -- and wasted duplication of services and positions could be eliminated, as I noted a few days ago.

The time has come to deal with the myriad problems at TSU by recognizing that this relic of the Jim Crow era is no longer viable. End it, don't mend it.

UPDATE: Tom Kirkendall over at Houston's Clear Thinkers offers a deeper analysis, reaching the same conclusion.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, The Random Yak, Adam's Blog, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Phastidio.net, Cao's Blog, The Amboy Times, 123 Beta, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, stikNstein... has no mercy, The Uncooperative Blogger ®, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:38 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 618 words, total size 6 kb.

The next generation of manned space vehicle continues to be developed on schedule.

The new rocket that will replace the space shuttle for carrying crews to the International Space Station is on schedule and within weight guidelines, NASA officials said Thursday.

The National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationÂ’s associate administrator for exploration, Scott Horowitz, said that the design of the rocket, the Ares I, was progressing well and that the rocket should be ready for its first test flight on schedule in 2009.

This tracks with what I've been hearing from some of the local guys involved in this project and those on related components of the future of space exploration.

Posted by: Greg at 11:22 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.

I wonder -- will the Israelis act to make sure that this potential Islamo-Spy Satellite never makes it off the launch pad?

RAN is on the verge of launching a satellite into space that could herald a new dimension in Tehran's strategic capabilities, Aviation Week and Space Technology says on its website.

The recently assembled, 30-tonne ballistic missile-turned space launcher could also be used for testing longer-range missile strike technologies, the magazine said in a report for its January 29 issue.

The Iranian space launcher "will lift off soon'' with an Iranian satellite, said Alaoddin Boroujerdi, chairman of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, according to the weekly.

It is decidedly not in the interest of either Israel of the United States to have "Big Mullah" watching over us. And since the test could also be a pretext for testing long-range ballistic missiles, it seems to me that it would be best if it suffered a horrible accident, courtesy of the IAF.

Posted by: Greg at 01:54 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.

Forgive me if I don't give a rat's hindquarters about the worry, concern, and anxiety caused to illegal immigrants by the fact that ICE is starting to take its mandate to handle immigration matters seriously.

Cook Rosa Maria Salazar's eyes dart anxiously to the door as customers file into the Salvadoran cafe in a heavily Hispanic neighborhood near downtown Los Angeles.

"We're terrified. The police could come for us at any time and deport us," she said in Spanish earlier this week as diners fingered maize tortillas stuffed with beans and pork scratchings and chatted softly.

The 55-year-old undocumented worker from Guatemala is among many Hispanics deeply shaken by recent immigration raids at the heart of Latino communities in southern California.

The-seven day Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweep, dubbed "Operation Return to Sender," targeted jails across five counties in the Los Angeles area, where police took 423 of what they called "criminal aliens" into federal custody for deportation, after being held on charges unrelated to their immigration status.

Federal agents from seven teams also fanned out in local communities, where they nabbed 338 undocumented immigrants, more than 150 of whom were classed as "immigration fugitives" -- foreign nationals who ignored final deportation orders.

The raid was the latest in a series of get-tough enforcement measures by ICE in the United States, but the largest action of its kind in California, where more than a third of the population is Hispanic.

"We hadn't seen anything like this here before, and it came as a shock," said Antonio Bernabe, a community worker who runs a day labor program at the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles.

"The police didn't just take people with deportation orders, they took anybody ... guys who were just hanging out in the street and even from a Jack in the Box restaurant ... and now people are afraid to go out," he added.

Fear is precisely what these folks ought to be feeling following the latest round of immigration raids. Indeed, every single border-jumping immigration criminal ought to live in constant terror of deportation. That isn't hatred or bigotry talking -- that is respect for the rule of law.

Indeed, my only objection is that there are at least 12 million more of these folks at large, violating American law with every breath they take on our nation's soil -- and that they are not yet frightened enough to get the hell out of the US in order to re-enter in a legal manner, at which point I will gladly welcome them with open arms.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, Perri Nelson's Website, The Random Yak, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Thought Alarm, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Sujet- Celebrities, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, stikNstein... has no mercy, Pirate's Cove, Renaissance Blogger, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 12:56 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 519 words, total size 5 kb.

Normally with a headline like that I'd be making a couple of Aggie jokes at the expense of my buddies who went to school in College Station. But believe it or not, there is a controversy raging over certain experiments being conducted in Oregon and elsewhere to determine the differences between gay and straight sheep, and seeking to discover what stimuli might trigger one set of sexual behavior or the other.

SCIENTISTS are conducting experiments to change the sexuality of “gay” sheep in a programme that critics fear could pave the way for breeding out homosexuality in humans.

The technique being developed by American researchers adjusts the hormonal balance in the brains of homosexual rams so that they are more inclined to mate with ewes.

It raises the prospect that pregnant women could one day be offered a treatment to reduce or eliminate the chance that their offspring will be homosexual. Experts say that, in theory, the “straightening” procedure on humans could be as simple as a hormone supplement for mothers-to-be, worn on the skin like an anti-smoking nicotine patch.

The research, at Oregon State University in the city of Corvallis and at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, has caused an outcry. Martina Navratilova, the lesbian tennis player who won Wimbledon nine times, and scientists and gay rights campaigners in Britain have called for the project to be abandoned.

Now this research does raise all sorts of questions. First, it could very well help determine the source of homosexuality -- nature, nurture, or choice -- and place it squarely in the "nature" column. But it also raises the possibility of being able to "correct" whatever causes homosexuals to deviate from the biological norm. If such "treatment" becomes available, should it be permitted? Should it be required? And should parents be permitted to make that determination for their unborn or minor offspring -- or should the choice be reserved to individuals who have reached some arbitrarily determined age of reason/consent?

How close are we to reaching the point where such issues need to be considered? Possibly closer than one might imagine.

Approximately one ram in 10 prefers to mount other rams rather than mate with ewes, reducing its value to a farmer. Initially, the publicly funded project aimed to improve the productivity of herds.

The scientists have been able to pinpoint the mechanisms influencing the desires of “male-oriented” rams by studying their brains. The animals’ skulls are cut open and electronic sensors are attached to their brains.

By varying the hormone levels, mainly by injecting hormones into the brain, they have had “considerable success” in altering the rams’ sexuality, with some previously gay animals becoming attracted to ewes.

* * *

Potentially, the techniques could one day be adapted for human use, with doctors perhaps being able to offer parents pre-natal tests to determine the likely sexuality of offspring or a hormonal treatment to change the orientation of a child.

Now I'll be the first to concede that I haven't the foggiest notion of how long it might take to translate such work from sheep to human. It seems, though, that we might be talking a matter of a decade or so, given these results. So we need to start giving the matter serious consideration. Should there be research that could lead to a "cure" for homosexuality -- or is it a condition that needs to be cured? Where are the ethical lines here? Are they the same as the political ones?

And I'll be honest here -- I don't have any answers that I am comfortable with.

What do you think?

UPDATE -- 1/25/2006: Since I posted this on December 30, 2006, there have been some more developments. The NY Times offers this new article on the controversy.

Ms. Navratilova, who also received a response from the university, said she remained unconvinced.

“The more we play God or try to improve on Mother Nature, the more damage we are doing with all kinds of experiments that either have already turned or will turn into nightmares,” she wrote in an e-mail reply to a reporter’s query. “How in the world could straight or gay sheep help humanity?”

Now I realize that Ms. Navratilova's long career in professional tennis makes her a leading expert in the field of bioethics, so I'll ask her and other opponents of this research one simple question -- where do you stand on fetal stem-cell research?

Posted by: Greg at 12:29 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 754 words, total size 5 kb.

This coming Chinese New Year marks the beginning of the Year of the Pig – but you won’t see any porkers on Chinese television, due to sensitivity to China’s small Muslim population.

Companies looking to reach China's consumer market with pig images during Year of the Pig celebrations next month will have to adjust after a national television network adopted a policy to be sensitive to the country's small Muslim population, according to published reports.

China Central Television said it would ban all verbal and visual pork references from advertisements during Lunar New Year celebrations next month, the Wall Street Journal reported. This week, the network banned a TV ad from Nestle SA featuring a smiling cartoon pig and the message, "Happy new pig year."

CCTV's ad department said the regulations are intended to avoid offending Muslims, who consider pigs unclean animals. China's 20 million Muslims comprise less than 2 percent of the population, the Journal reported.

"China is a multiethnic country," the network said in a notice. "To show respect for Islam, and upon guidance from higher levels of the government, CCTV will keep any pig images off the screen."

Let’s see – 20 million Muslims, out of a population of 1.3 billion, are sufficient to suppress the culture of the overwhelming (98%) majority. I don’t know about you, but I find crap like that to be at least as offensive as a pig is to Muslims.

Posted by: Greg at 11:12 AM | Comments (65) | Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.

1 cisspyeu, ilsqekxu, =-PPP, dlfulvra, sef, ykgtpfog, 5835,

Posted by: Swtyhrkf at Thu Nov 27 23:32:50 2008 (VXdmF)

2 astcpvc, cfadkffc, uffj, mnlitnwh, 665, uwgdqlkl, 849, rphszfvz, vhkqur, ifyhpded, 733, hcwbuanh, =-((,

Posted by: Jpnqqmli at Sat Dec 6 15:58:00 2008 (LQz5l)

3 druplot, tyckwmut, 5497, znsutwue, 8-[[[, jkqbbuzk, djkb, tvnzbchd, =[, hlmizjym, vhyd,

Posted by: Rkeomdia at Tue Dec 9 23:26:05 2008 (PsoZ2)

4 tavshar, prgmyuyy, =], nlkbhzjv, cgs, hitfkubu, > , mvrndjyc, 084, jscpsqai, >:]]],

Posted by: Ojwzokjy at Wed Dec 10 08:50:17 2008 (zucwh)

5 banlott, pjdaovfz, %-))),

Posted by: Vofzdzan at Mon Dec 15 12:45:48 2008 (qEKWM)

6 wr mame, fhncsstv, 072953,

Posted by: Tjcmzuky at Tue Dec 16 18:45:28 2008 (oZz2p)

7 tsssadd, fohseffz, 297416, khqiwdzb, dcaly, rmxeinyt, lkd, fcokluey, 714783, yptrxofb, 15396,

Posted by: Qwysqapa at Tue Dec 16 23:48:05 2008 (vwiTn)

8 tn dhab, tkimflnm, %]], jutleljl, =-DD, tunjujto, vuyn, hzreanla, ujuqer, okdedyyb, mdygt,

Posted by: Cubpzolz at Wed Dec 17 04:49:33 2008 (FcH9H)

9 fortila, lhsxicca, nnirf, vipmidnk, 033441, doczpfaa, 0683, fvvxezqm, 98122, jrmwmiym, yki,

Posted by: Srfzajbe at Thu Dec 18 21:34:50 2008 (0/DsQ)

10 qetghoy jogqiml nazjaka http://wcemaim.com

Posted by: Hello at Sat Dec 20 17:18:26 2008 (xDHzC)

11 Hello! cheap lasix online, 259, online kamagra buy, 6979, online hytrin, 9620, lipitor online purchase, 7693, order cheap levaquin, 5157,

Posted by: url at Thu Jan 1 04:38:40 2009 (AVwb1)

12 Hello! nolvadex buy, 5401, uk nexium, 5970, prednisone uk, 2302, paxil uk, 1654, phentrimine cheap, 8214,

Posted by: url at Fri Jan 2 01:34:32 2009 (sHcbt)

13 Hello! purchase revatio, 9093, prozac online order, 378, speman online order, 5617, propecia online, 6710, proscar online purchase, 279,

Posted by: here at Fri Jan 2 06:46:05 2009 (sHcbt)

14 Hello! buy soma, 3691, buy propecia canada, 1516, buy generic propranolol online, 9168, revatio canada, 8206, online rimonabant buy, 8514,

Posted by: url at Fri Jan 2 06:49:41 2009 (sHcbt)

15 Hello! uk sumycin cheap, 5089, tenormin canada, 4811, generic tetracycline online, 9979, purchase stromectol, 7003, purchase trazodone, 2830,

Posted by: here at Fri Jan 2 09:44:56 2009 (sHcbt)

16 Hello! online vpxl buy, 3906, valtrex online purchase, 5293, uk buy zimulti, 6807, buy zelnorm uk, 4569, online ultram, 6728,

Posted by: link at Fri Jan 2 12:43:01 2009 (sHcbt)

17 Hello! cheap zithromax online, 1185, uk order zyloprim, 8934, generic zyban online, 987, order zoloft online, 6670, zocor order, 2980,

Posted by: url at Fri Jan 2 15:34:40 2009 (sHcbt)

18 Hello! uk order zocor, 2660, buy zyban usa, 7356, purchase cheap zyloprim, 7593, zoloft online order, 1905, zovirax buy online, 3648,

Posted by: link at Fri Jan 2 15:37:36 2009 (sHcbt)

19 Hello! zyrtec, 2414, buy zyprexa, 7223,

Posted by: Zyrtec at Fri Jan 2 18:22:54 2009 (sHcbt)

20 Hello! zyrtec, 6220, buy zyprexa, 7049,

Posted by: Zyrtec at Fri Jan 2 18:25:38 2009 (sHcbt)

21 Hello! soma, 6225,

Posted by: url at Sun Jan 4 04:53:07 2009 (DPSYo)

22 Hello! soma, 3497,

Posted by: url at Sun Jan 4 04:55:49 2009 (DPSYo)

23 Hello! generic lexapro, 7329, revatio online, 4795, uk buy celexa, 9262, buy paxil canada, 3096, uk zyprexa, 1521,

Posted by: link at Sun Jan 4 15:19:57 2009 (DPSYo)

24 Hello! zyprexa usa, 4457, revatio cheap, 9981, buy ultram usa, 2579, celexa, 5408, order prevacid online, 3772,

Posted by: link at Sun Jan 4 15:23:09 2009 (DPSYo)

25 Hello! buy wellbutrin, 2854, uk order hoodia, 5821, order cheap effexor, 6590, uk order lioresal, 1343, order generic zyban, 1635,

Posted by: here at Sun Jan 4 18:15:44 2009 (DPSYo)

26 Hello! cheap ultram, 9838, buy generic vpxl online, 6907, buy cytotec uk, 5868, order propecia, 4915, order soma, 5764,

Posted by: link at Mon Jan 5 00:01:50 2009 (DPSYo)

27 Hello! purchase effexor online, 9044, wellbutrin usa, 7393, order zoloft uk, 3478, uk order lioresal, 2738, uk lexapro, 425,

Posted by: here at Mon Jan 5 02:56:34 2009 (jLaI1)

28 Hello! purchase zocor, 147, sumycin, 5817, buy generic zimulti online, 4382, online vpxl order, 9954, uk zyloprim, 6474,

Posted by: link at Sun Jan 11 21:35:35 2009 (RJCTX)

29 Hello! purchase generic zoloft, 5889, prednisone usa, 4256, prozac uk, 4397, online zelnorm, 720, buy tetracycline online, 4348,

Posted by: link at Sun Jan 11 21:38:46 2009 (RJCTX)

30 Hello! purchase doxazosin, 8889, buy cymbalta usa, 6563, uk order clomid, 7805, confido generic, 6836, cytotec uk, 7712,

Posted by: link at Tue Jan 13 04:02:13 2009 (zYRCw)

31 Hello! order prozac usa, 7823, buy xenical uk, 172, uk soma, 2697, generic zyban online, 5476, uk ultracet cheap, 925,

Posted by: link at Tue Jan 13 13:42:20 2009 (zYRCw)

32 Hello! cheap viagra, 3889, buy doxycycline online, 6548, uk acyclovir, 5450, buy tenormin canada, 5217, uk zimulti cheap, 865,

Posted by: here at Fri Jan 23 13:41:55 2009 (0fiqL)

33 Hello! online viagra, 6903, viagra online, 5208,

Posted by: link at Fri Jan 23 18:10:07 2009 (0fiqL)

34 6Oij9x comment1, acomplia, eob, viagra, 47226,

Posted by: buy ultram at Sun Jan 25 04:40:32 2009 (BzNah)

35 comment3, ionamin 30 mg, pzvqm,

Posted by: acomplia at Sun Jan 25 22:36:09 2009 (BWMCq)

36 comment5, acomplia, tmaf,

Posted by: viagra at Sun Jan 25 23:15:23 2009 (X8kmw)

37 comment6, buy revatio online, =-)),

Posted by: viagra at Sun Jan 25 23:45:40 2009 (nfiZ/)

38 comment4, where can i buy acomplia, kuiaqi,

Posted by: buy viagra online at Mon Jan 26 00:45:45 2009 (Eg9OF)

39 comment2, cheap adipex, %OO,

Posted by: cheap adipex at Mon Jan 26 01:53:55 2009 (V6jY+)

40 comment2, ultram, >:-)),

Posted by: ionamin 15 mg at Mon Jan 26 02:13:21 2009 (LZtkJ)

41 comment3, buy viagra, 09643,

Posted by: viagra at Mon Jan 26 02:23:32 2009 (Eg9OF)

42 comment2, buy viagra online, 174,

Posted by: buy ultram online at Mon Jan 26 05:01:36 2009 (Bpm4K)

43 comment5, buy ultram, oyhy,

Posted by: buy viagra online at Mon Jan 26 06:02:56 2009 (geja/)

44 comment3, ionamin 30 mg, 4257,

Posted by: ultram at Mon Jan 26 06:32:55 2009 (+BHwH)

45 comment6, viagra, lqvbru,

Posted by: ionamin 15 mg at Mon Jan 26 07:06:11 2009 (NypAm)

46 comment5, ultram 50mg, %OO,

Posted by: viagra at Mon Jan 26 07:15:44 2009 (4JabP)

47 comment2, ionamin, cuu,

Posted by: adipex online at Mon Jan 26 07:27:15 2009 (Eg9OF)

48 comment3, rimonabant, >:OOO,

Posted by: buy adipex at Mon Jan 26 09:08:53 2009 (wddTV)

49 comment2, plavix generic, lher,

Posted by: buy viagra online at Mon Jan 26 21:20:57 2009 (lNfTm)

50 comment1, discount soma, 01430,

Posted by: acomplia rimonabant at Mon Jan 26 21:37:45 2009 (JjXpu)

51 comment2, buy phentermine, 8-]]],

Posted by: buy soma online at Tue Jan 27 04:42:28 2009 (SV44A)

52 comment4, defat rimonabant, ytjdwj,

Posted by: buy levitra online at Wed Jan 28 14:28:52 2009 (TcZWv)

53 comment2, buy levitra online, wqewfm,

Posted by: cheap soma at Wed Jan 28 15:41:43 2009 (4JabP)

54 comment3, buy phentermine, =((,

Posted by: soma at Wed Jan 28 17:48:14 2009 (/lgQ7)

55 comment5, prescription soma, fezt,

Posted by: levitra at Thu Jan 29 04:49:51 2009 (LH0TB)

56 comment6, cheap phentermine, 116106,

Posted by: soma carisoprodol at Thu Jan 29 10:16:28 2009 (l2Xym)

57 comment6, levitra, 825,

Posted by: generic norvasc at Thu Jan 29 14:20:08 2009 (RSUUo)

58 comment5, viagra, hemngm,

Posted by: rimonabant without a prescription at Fri Jan 30 14:50:01 2009 (NJTsc)

59 He who boasts of his ancestry is praising the deeds of another. http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/root9127/molecular-weight-of-methane.html - molecular weight of methane http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/root/cipro-urinary-tract-infections.html - cipro urinary tract infections http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/root9127/lamisil-liver.html - lamisil liver http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/root84284/capybaras-diet.html - capybaras diet http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/total-care-pharmacy.html - total care pharmacy http://elfapure.hat-die-beste-webseite.de/root84284/bushel-by-vegetable-weight.html - bushel by vegetable weight

Posted by: Jamel at Tue Feb 3 00:41:41 2009 (AxoY5)

60 jtqnjoas 973177

Posted by: Vmbphhoq at Tue Feb 3 23:07:45 2009 (mrzlt)

61 I do agree with you. order ambien online http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?u=23746 or ambien cr generic I couldn't agree with you more!

Posted by: ambien cr generic at Wed Feb 4 07:19:46 2009 (XqiCc)

62 I would be the most content if my children grew up to be the kind of people who think decorating consists mostly of building enough bookshelves. http://sursywas.iespana.es/next96596/free-gallery-movie-nude-secretary.html - free gallery movie nude secretary http://sursywas.iespana.es/next96596/brunette-fucking-hard.html - brunette fucking hard

Posted by: Lolek at Sat Feb 7 05:43:04 2009 (VBomR)

63 comment3, ultram, rlos,

Posted by: levitra at Mon Feb 9 19:40:35 2009 (yrj3j)

64 viagra

Posted by: rimonabant at Mon Mar 2 22:30:43 2009 (E+7aV)

65 Protonix jmh

Posted by: Buy Xanax at Wed Mar 4 19:05:29 2009 (i02AQ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The stats are clear – fewer Americans are members of labor unions.

The number of wage and salary workers who were union members dropped to 12 percent of the work force last year, the lowest percentage since the government started tracking that number over two decades ago.

The number of workers in a union was 20.1 percent in 1983, when Bureau of Labor Statistics first provided such comparable numbers, and that number has been declining steadily. More than a third of American workers, about 35 percent, were union members in the mid-1950s.

The question, of course, is what this means. Is it a question of the growth of the workforce in areas of the country with right to work laws? Is it related to the increase in professional, white collar jobs over the more commonly unionized blue collar fields? Or is it a question of unions having ceased to meet the needs of workers as perceived by workers?

Unions, of course, are using this statistic to bolster the case for legislation that they claim would make it easier to for workers to unionize.

The continuing decline in union membership, documented in the BLS report released Thursday, comes as organized labor is pushing for legislation in the Democratic-controlled Congress making it easier for workers to form unions.

That proposal, called the Employee Free Choice Act, would let workers form unions more readily by simply signing a card or petition, impose stronger penalties on employers who violate labor laws, and allow for arbitration to settle first contract disputes.

Advocates of the legislation say they doubt that it will get signed into law by President Bush, but that they think passage in Congress would make eventual signing of the law more likely.

Supporters say the law is more fair to workers because employers can't mount a campaign to prevent formation of a union. Opponents say it deprives workers of the right to vote privately on their union preferences, and can lead to union intimidation of workers.

The union membership rate for government workers, 36.2 percent, was substantially higher than for private industry workers, 7.4 percent.

The problem with this legislation should be obvious. Given the history of thuggish union tactics to coerce membership, the “card check” method opens workers up to harassment and coercion that a secret ballot does not. And as recent Supreme Court arguments show, unions are all about coercing workers – even those who act affirmatively to opt out of membership – into supporting political activity and paying for services that they do not want to be involved in.

Quite bluntly, this country does, in fact, need an Employee Free Choice Act. But rather than the current legislation that seeks to deny workers choices, such legislation should start with the presumption that workers do not want to be members of a union, and which abolishes both the compulsory union shop and the agency fee for non-members. Let workers have a truly free choice on whether or not they join a union – and recognize that over 90% of private sector workers have chosen not to join. I suspect that the membership figure would be far lower in the public sector were it not for the compulsory union membership required by many school districts and other government entities. Indeed, the free choice most needed is for workers to be permitted to say "no" to having their paychecks pilfered by corrupt union bosses.

UPDATE: Want a good reason for ending the constitutional abomination of forced unionism, especially in the public sector? Look at this case from Ohio, involving the Ohio Education Association.

Told by a union official to pay forced dues or "change religions," a teacher in southern Ohio is challenging a state law that allows only those public employees who belong to certain denominations the right to claim religious objection to paying union dues.

Carol Katter, a mathematics and language arts instructor in the St. Marys district, filed a federal complaint in the U.S. District Court in Columbus this week over an Ohio law that prevents the lifelong Catholic from diverting her dues from a union she refuses to fund because it supports abortion on demand.

Katter filed the complaint against top officials of the State Employment Relations Board (SERB) for religious discrimination in enforcing Ohio Revised Code section 4117.09(C), which states:

"Any public employee who is a member of and adheres to established and traditional tenets or teachings of a bona fide religion or religious body which has historically held conscientious objections to joining or financially supporting an employee organization and which is exempt from taxation under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code shall not be required to join or financially support any employee organization as a condition of employment." (emphasis added)

In other words, the law in Ohio is that a public employee is required to fund religiously repugnant speech unless their church also opposes union membership in all instances. I guess they haven't heard of the First Amendment up there, or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They also are ignoring a federal court ruling from last year in a nearly identical case which held that public employees with religious objections to union affiliation could not be forced to pay union dues.

But as far as I am concerned, there is an even more basic issue -- upon what legitimate grounds can government require payments to a private organization as a requirement for holding a public-sector, taxpayer funded job? What next -- a return to the days when government employees were expected to make contributions to the "correct" political candidates as a condition of keeping their jobs? That practice is no more repugnant to the First Amendment than the situation found in Ms. Katter's case.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, Perri Nelson's Website, The Random Yak, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, basil's blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Thought Alarm, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Sujet- Celebrities, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, stikNstein... has no mercy, Pirate's Cove, Renaissance Blogger, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:11 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 1043 words, total size 9 kb.

White students hold a party with a theme that offends minority students. Minority students complain. School launches an investigation. Why?

Authorities at Tarleton State University said they plan to investigate a Martin Luther King Jr. Day party that mocked black stereotypes by featuring fried chicken, malt liquor and faux gang apparel.

"I feel like there is no excuse for this type of ignorance," said Donald Ray Elder, president of the Stephenville school's chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Photographs posted on social networking Web site Facebook.com showed partygoers wearing Afro wigs and fake gold and silver teeth. One photo showed students "mocking how African-Americans do step shows," Elder said. In another picture, a student is dressed as Aunt Jemima and carries a gun.

"That upsets me," Elder said. "That's someone who knows nothing about Dr. King, because Dr. King was totally about nonviolence."

Wanda Mercer, the school's vice president of student life, said an investigation was planned into the Jan. 15 party.

I guess I don’t see the need to investigate. The First Amendment guarantees a right to freedom of speech and freedom of association – even speech and association that are offensive and repulsive, such as this event appears to be. But obnoxious activity is not the basis for a government entity to investigate or (one would presume this is where the investigation is headed) impose sanctions. Stupidity is not a crime.

Posted by: Greg at 11:10 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.

White students hold a party with a theme that offends minority students. Minority students complain. School launches an investigation. Why?

Authorities at Tarleton State University said they plan to investigate a Martin Luther King Jr. Day party that mocked black stereotypes by featuring fried chicken, malt liquor and faux gang apparel.

"I feel like there is no excuse for this type of ignorance," said Donald Ray Elder, president of the Stephenville school's chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Photographs posted on social networking Web site Facebook.com showed partygoers wearing Afro wigs and fake gold and silver teeth. One photo showed students "mocking how African-Americans do step shows," Elder said. In another picture, a student is dressed as Aunt Jemima and carries a gun.

"That upsets me," Elder said. "That's someone who knows nothing about Dr. King, because Dr. King was totally about nonviolence."

Wanda Mercer, the school's vice president of student life, said an investigation was planned into the Jan. 15 party.

I guess I don’t see the need to investigate. The First Amendment guarantees a right to freedom of speech and freedom of association – even speech and association that are offensive and repulsive, such as this event appears to be. But obnoxious activity is not the basis for a government entity to investigate or (one would presume this is where the investigation is headed) impose sanctions. Stupidity is not a crime.

Posted by: Greg at 11:10 AM | Comments (23) | Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.

1 comment6, pamela anderson sex tape
, >:-PPP, knock off coach purses
, vnof, Cheapest paris hilton sex tape
, 8-DDD, Cheapest groping train
, kyvm, no credit check loans
, zppvlw,

Posted by: djwjoij at Tue Feb 10 11:16:33 2009 (MJ8zV)

2 Nope!, and jessica alba wallpaper, and PP, and kim kardashian nude pics, and 685881, and emma watson fake, and 20946, and megan fox naked, and 246, and

Posted by: Badkxyub at Thu May 7 08:41:23 2009 (27tpb)

3 Yami., and lindsay lohan hot, and 2840, and

Posted by: Tjolcvtm at Thu May 7 08:42:20 2009 (Lq+wT)

4 Extra., and paris hilton movie, and 8PPP, and

Posted by: Spbdlboa at Thu May 7 10:25:43 2009 (oF7SV)

5 Holly..., and tila tequila sex tape, and %[, and

Posted by: Iakrzziy at Thu May 7 10:26:20 2009 (xi4gZ)

6 Shoooot., and kim kardashian porn, and ((, and tila tequila galleries, and >:-)), and kim kardashian ray j, and :-[, and pamela anderson porn, and :-D, and

Posted by: Mzvcjypr at Thu May 14 05:30:50 2009 (GUXTo)

7 Yess., and tila tequila pussy, and bavo, and tila tequila pussy, and 7158, and tila tequila pussy, and mzpd, and pamela anderson porn, and 76785, and

Posted by: Rlealiqo at Thu May 14 05:31:39 2009 (GUXTo)

8 Boom boom!, and emma watson nude, and gvwmle, and kim kardashian sex, and fujrls, and pamela anderson naked, and ibw, and pam anderson nude, and , and

Posted by: Tangnpsm at Thu May 14 10:15:58 2009 (tCbYc)

9 Shit!, and gallery of paris hilton, and 8-(, and kim kardashian porn, and ohvy, and megan fox nude pics, and nip, and

Posted by: Kvpmbkhm at Thu May 14 10:16:52 2009 (TWm0S)

10 Hehe., and emma watson fakes, and qfiolx, and tila tequila naked, and ajlhfe, and kim kardashian pussy, and =]]], and miley cyrus topless, and =((, and

Posted by: Tcjrowgy at Thu May 14 12:07:04 2009 (IxJvS)

11 Hehe., and emma watson fakes, and qfiolx, and tila tequila naked, and ajlhfe, and kim kardashian pussy, and =]]], and miley cyrus topless, and =((, and

Posted by: Tcjrowgy at Thu May 14 12:07:04 2009 (IxJvS)

12 Hehe., and emma watson fakes, and qfiolx, and tila tequila naked, and ajlhfe, and kim kardashian pussy, and =]]], and miley cyrus topless, and =((, and

Posted by: Tcjrowgy at Thu May 14 12:07:08 2009 (TtTMJ)

13 Hehe., and emma watson fakes, and qfiolx, and tila tequila naked, and ajlhfe, and kim kardashian pussy, and =]]], and miley cyrus topless, and =((, and

Posted by: Tcjrowgy at Thu May 14 12:07:08 2009 (TtTMJ)

14 New pics., and emma watson fakes, and ulgojx, and

Posted by: Uyzvxvfm at Sat May 16 13:00:55 2009 (TWm0S)

15 Crazy pics., and megan fox fhm, and 430981, and

Posted by: Apbxroko at Sat May 16 23:38:36 2009 (t6Tf+)

16 New , and tila tequila naked, and 4151, and paris hilton sex, and D, and

Posted by: Duxdabwv at Mon May 18 21:51:05 2009 (3DNbn)

17 Stuff., and emma watson fakes, and :]]], and

Posted by: Lgobavat at Tue May 19 01:03:34 2009 (kz7Ff)

18 Crazy pics., and jessica alba backgrounds, and dax, and

Posted by: Snojmawx at Tue May 19 07:19:03 2009 (3aM5Q)

19 New., and pam anderson nude, and ooftc, and

Posted by: Xqqmvmyo at Tue May 19 09:15:48 2009 (GzDMG)

20 New , and megan fox nude pics, and 712126, and

Posted by: Ilnypcug at Tue May 19 11:09:05 2009 (RfS4G)

21 Shit!, and britney spears sextape, and 249893, and

Posted by: Xelkkcks at Tue May 19 14:40:22 2009 (6QCVY)

22 New , and megan fox pics, and fcte, and miley cyrus naked, and =-), and pamela anderson sex, and %D, and emma watson gallery, and ifbsn, and

Posted by: Cotqjore at Tue May 19 14:41:06 2009 (+UgET)

23 Knowledge., and kim kardashian naked, and eht, and britney spears ass, and 655, and naked britney spears, and 8-O, and angelina jolie wallpaper, and :-)), and

Posted by: Jexqrrrw at Thu May 21 22:20:05 2009 (IsTVG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Are we seeing opposition to homosexuality finally classified as a mental illness? Has the Soviet model finally taken root here at home, with dissent from left-wing ideology declared to be a grounds for psychological intervention?

Isaiah Washington, who does the healing as a doctor on "Grey's Anatomy," is the patient now.

He's in therapy for his use of an anti-gay slur against a castmate.

"With the support of my family and friends, I have begun counseling. I regard this as a necessary step toward understanding why I did what I did and making sure it never happens again," Washington said in a statement Wednesday. "I appreciate the fact that I have been given this opportunity and I remain committed to transforming my negative actions into positive results, personally and professionally."

Good griuef – sounds like the sort of self-criticism that went on at Maoist forced labor camps. What next – medication and shock treatment like at Lefortovo Prison in Moscow?

Mind you, I’m not defending Washington’s boorish actions – I’m just questioning the basis for this “therapy”.

Posted by: Greg at 11:08 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.

A football player promises a fan during an interview that if his team makes the Superbowl, he will take the fan along. The team makes the SuperBowl. What should happen?

That is a controversy raging in the Chicago area, after Bears safety Chris Harris made such a promise to Bryan Lange during a 40-second interview for a public-access television show.

Months before the Chicago Bears clinched their first trip to the Super Bowl in 21 years, safety Chris Harris stared into a video camera and promised to take fan Bryan Lange with him to Miami if the team made it to the big game.

The apparent promise -- made during a 40-second interview with a public access television show last June -- might have seemed like a longshot at the time.
But now that the Bears are in, thanks in part to Harris' big plays last Sunday, Lange is trying to hold Harris to his words.

Lange, a construction worker from Crystal Lake and a Bears season ticket holder, has set up camp on the road to Halas Hall this week with a sign saying, "Chris Harris You Promised.''

He also posted a clip of the interview he filmed at a charity event at www.psychobabble tv.com/chrisharrispromised.

In it, Harris tells Lange -- who goes by the name Chong on a show called Psycho Babble -- that his goal is to make it to the Super Bowl.

Says Lange: "If you guys make it to the Super Bowl, I'll sell my Harley to go.''

Harris replies, "You won't have to sell it. I will give you tickets.''

Lange replies, "I'm going to hold you to it. I've got you on tape.''

Harris, looking at the camera, then agrees: "It's on tape. If we win, he's going.''
Lange concludes the interview by saying, "Chong is going to the Super Bowl with the Bears on Chris Harris' dollar.''

HarrisÂ’ agent calls LangeÂ’s demand unreasonable, based upon the fact that Harris only can purchase 15 tickets and has about 40 family members who want to attend the game. Lange and his supporters think Harris ought to take him along. Personally, I think someone in the Bears organization ought to scrounge up a ticket to keep a fan happy and get some good publicity out of the deal.

Posted by: Greg at 11:07 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 2 kb.

Or is this one more illusion of progress?

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas have pledged to forge a peace between their countries, calling the vision of two states, side by side, the only path.

With Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas watching, Livni told the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum that a Palestinian state is "not an illusion. It's there, it's achievable".

Livni urged the international community to support moderates in the Middle East.

She told Abbas that "compromising with extremists will not promote anything" - a clear reference to Hamas and other militant groups.

Abbas listened intently, nodding his head, and afterwards greeted her warmly with a long handshake.

He reiterated that if he cannot form a unity government with Hamas officials, he will move to call early elections, but gave no specific timetable.

Abbas was addressing a large crowd of political leaders, corporate bosses and others at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting.

He said that such an agreement would help strengthen the hands of moderates in the region and fight extremism of all types.

But will Hamas, Hezbollah, and the other extremists in the region allow such a deal to happen. After all, the entire origin of the conflict was the refusal of Arabs to live with a two-state solution that Israel embraced from its inception. Can the Palestinians quit murdering Jews long enough to achieve what could have been theirs six decades ago?

Posted by: Greg at 11:05 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.

Or will they just be well rested for the big game?

Bears finally asleep as cold wave hits Russia

Oh -- wrong bears!

Posted by: Greg at 11:04 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.

Or will they just be well rested for the big game?

Bears finally asleep as cold wave hits Russia

Oh -- wrong bears!

Posted by: Greg at 11:04 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

Could it be that it is uncomfortably close to the truth?

Study: Americans spend more time with computer than spouse

Well, IÂ’ll know for sure if the divorce papers include Intel, Microsoft, and my ISP as responding parties.

Posted by: Greg at 11:04 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

This is a move which should have been made long ago.

White House hopeful Tom Tancredo said Thursday the existence of the Congressional Black Caucus and other race-based groups of lawmakers amount to segregation and should be abolished.

"It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a colorblind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race," said the Colorado Republican, who is most widely known as a vocal critic of illegal immigration.

"If we are serious about achieving the goal of a colorblind society, Congress should lead by example and end these divisive, race-based caucuses," said Tancredo, who is scheduled to pitch his long-shot presidential bid this weekend in New Hampshire.

Tancredo's request, relayed in a letter to Administration Committee Chairwoman Juanita Millender-McDonald, D-Calif., revived his effort to change House rules to abolish the groups. Besides the Congressional Black Caucus, Democrats also have a Hispanic caucus with 21 members, and Republicans have a comparable Hispanic conference with five full members and 11 "associate" members who are not Hispanic.

The request comes in the wake of reports that freshman Rep. Stephen Cohen, D-Tenn., was refused admission to the Congressional Black Caucus because he is white. All 43 members of the caucus are black.

However, given the tendency of Congress to exempt itself from so many laws, I don’t believe that our elected leaders would ever have the integrity to hold themselves to the same standard that they expect of “We, the People.”

Posted by: Greg at 10:55 AM | Comments (32) | Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.

If certain senators want to pass resolutions undercutting the war effort in Iraq, then it is only appropriate that those of us who believe that effort has the effect of aiding the enemy have an obligation to speak out. A coalition of bloggers, spearheaded by Hugh Hewitt and NZ Bear have put together a coalition of bloggers to speak out on the matter.

Hewitt explains the effort this way.

Yesterday General Petraeus testified that the Biden/Warner resolutions and those like them encourage the enemy.

What does it mean, "to encourage the enemy?"

It means that the enemy gathers will and strength from the prospect of a collapsing political will to seek victory in Iraq and stability in the region.

With that additional strength and will the enemy redoubles and retriples efforts to kill American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines.

In short, it means that more Americans will die.

If there is ever an issue for which a filibuster is obviously called, it is such a resolution, especially in the aftermath of such testimony.

Either the Republicans believe General Petraeus, or they don't. These are not a "non-binding" resolutions in the sense that they have no consequences. Either of them will have terrible consequences.

Don't believe me. Believe General Petraeus.

And act accordingly. next week should mark an epic and important debate in the United States Senate. I hope that 39 Republicans will join at least Senator Joseph Lieberman is standing by the troops and their commander in iraq, as well as the president.

In my lifetime America has walked away from one set of allies, to its eternal disgrace. We must not do so again, lest we repeat April, 1975 all over again.

The resolution that this coalition proposes can be found over at Truth Laid Bear.

If the United States Senate passes a resolution, non-binding or otherwise, that criticizes the commitment of additional troops to Iraq that General Petraeus has asked for and that the president has pledged, and if the Senate does so after the testimony of General Petraeus on January 23 that such a resolution will be an encouragement to the enemy, I will not contribute to any Republican senator who voted for the resolution. Further, if any Republican senator who votes for such a resolution is a candidate for re-election in 2008, I will not contribute to the National Republican Senatorial Committee unless the Chairman of that Committee, Senator Ensign, commits in writing that none of the funds of the NRSC will go to support the re-election of any senator supporting the non-binding resolution.

I believe this is key -- there is no room for those in the GOP who would abandon the troops in the field in this manner, and we must say so clearly. I therefore urge you to sign the pledge, refer like-minded friends to the pledge, and contact your Senators and the Senate leadership to insist that they oppose any resolution that undercuts the war effort.

This is a defining issue of our time -- we must not fail in this effort, or history will judge this nation harshly. Assuming, of course, that failure does not leave our enemies writing that history.

The following are also blogging on the issue.

KickingOverMyTraces
Reverse Spin
The Wide Awake Cafe
Say Anything.
Bear To The Right
ThreeSources
MangledCat
Captain's Quarters

UPDATE: Hewitt wrote his column today about the Pledge.

Posted by: Greg at 11:29 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 570 words, total size 4 kb.

Buh-bye, John. Not that you ever stood a chance in 2008.

Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who narrowly lost the presidency to George Bush in 2004, announced today that he would not proceed with a second bid for the White House because he preferred to use his position in the new Senate majority to press for an end to American involvement in Iraq.

“We came close, certainly close enough to be tempted to try again, there are powerful reasons to want to follow that fight now,” Mr. Kerry said, invoking his 2004 race, at the conclusion of a 30-minute speech attacking Mr. Bush’s Iraq policy on the floor of the United States Senate. “I’ve concluded that this isn’t the time for me to mount a presidential campaign. It is the time to put my energy to work as part of the majority of he Senate and do all I can to end the war.”

Mr. KerryÂ’s announcement of his political plans, if unveiled in an unorthodox place, was not a surprise, notwithstanding his early statements that he would run again for the White House. He was in effect bowing to a Democratic Party that was clearly unreceptive and that had turned its attention to new candidates, in particular Senators Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, who got into the race over the past week. Many Democrats had said they expected Mr. Kerry would ultimately decide not to run after assessing how much strength he had in his party; as it is, most of his aides from the 2004 campaign have moved on.

So Kerry will forgo another run for Commander-in-Chief so he can stay in the Senate and undercut the troops and the war effort from there. Looks like he wants to be at the very heart of the effort to lose a war for the second time -- and he knows from experience that he can help do so much more effectively with irresponsible words in the Senate.

Posted by: Greg at 11:14 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 341 words, total size 2 kb.

But the Dems like Harry Reid and Jim Webb insist that George Bush isnÂ’t allowed to do anything but make nice with the mad mullahs and the Holocaust-denying/desiring leader of Iran. Will it take a nuclear holocaust on American soil to get the Blame-America-First Party to come around on the issue, or will continued rhetoric like this be sufficient?

Israel and the United States will soon be destroyed, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday during a meeting with Syria's foreign minister, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) said in a report.

"Iranian President Mahmoud AhmadinejadÂ… assured that the United States and the Zionist regime of Israel will soon come to the end of their lives," the Iranian president was quoted as saying.

"Sparking discord among Muslims, especially between the Shiites and Sunnis, is a plot hatched by the Zionists and the US for dominating regional nations and looting their resources," Ahmadinejad added, according to the report.

Is it time to start the bombing yet, Democrats be damned? Or do we let this genocidal maniac get nukes and carry out his plan to make Israel Juden frei -- and radioactive for at least the next 25,000 years?

Posted by: Greg at 12:10 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.

Looks like the NC Bar is charging Mike Nifong with even more – and even more serious – professional misconduct.

The state bar has added ethics charges to a complaint filed against the prosecutor who brought sexual assault charges against three Duke lacrosse players, accusing him of withholding DNA evidence and misleading the court.

The new charges by the North Carolina State Bar against Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong were announced Wednesday and could lead to his removal from the state bar, according to a copy of the updated complaint.

Looks like Nifong is going down. These charges, if upheld, will virtually require that the disgraced prosecutor be disbarred.

At what point will his misconduct be seen to have so poisoned this case as to make any charges unsustainable?

Posted by: Greg at 12:07 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.

Congress, not cities, regulates interstate commerce. This law, while intended for a noble purpose, must therefore be struck down.

The fate of a District law banning rail shipments of hazardous materials was back before a federal judge yesterday, nearly two years after the prohibition was enacted by the D.C. Council.

The law, which was prompted by fears that the Capitol and other landmarks are vulnerable to a terrorist attack on rail lines that skirt downtown, was quickly challenged in 2005 by CSX Transportation Inc., which controls the key freight routes through the District. The law has never taken effect. Yesterday, a judge heard arguments to determine whether it ever will.

If this law is permitted to stand, it would be the first of many such regulations that would have the effect of rendering entire segments of track unusable by railroads, or forcing the massive rerouting of shipments to meet with each little town’s ordinances. Sorry – that goes against the fundamental constitutional order of things, assuming the courts properly construe the Constitution.

Posted by: Greg at 12:05 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.

From Jimmy CarterÂ’s speech at Brandeis University.

"This is the first time that I've ever been called a liar and a bigot and an anti-Semite and a coward and a plagiarist." Carter paused and squinted at the audience. "This has hurt me."

Experts have demonstrated that your assertions are wrong. Participants in events have noted how you misrepresent them. Materials from another book have been used without attribution. And your claims of a Jewish conspiracy clearly echo the anti-Semitic canards of earlier generations and hate-filled ideologies.

But I will give you credit for stepping back from the most dangerous thing you wrote in your false, disgusting, and despicable book.

In particular, some students challenged Carter on a sentence that has brought him much grief. On Page 213 of his book, Carter wrote: "It is imperative that the general Arab community and all significant Palestinian groups make it clear that they will end the suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism when international laws and the ultimate goals of the Roadmap for Peace are accepted by Israel."

This sentence, the students noted, suggests that suicide bombings are a tactic of war, to be suspended only when peace is achieved. Carter agreed -- and apologized -- and said this sentence was a great mistake on his part.

"The sentence was worded in an absolutely improper and stupid way," Carter said. "I apologize to you and to everyone here . . . it was a mistake on my part."
He added that Palestinians who embrace terrorism draw no support from him.
Calls for the destruction of Israel, he said, "are completely obnoxious to me. I would have no brief for them and no sympathy for them."

But you still stand against the security fence, which has been the most successful means of preventing terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. Maybe you donÂ’t mean to support terrorism, Jimmy, but your advocacy for tearing down that anti-terrorist barrier does provide the terrorists with aid and comfort.

And you are still a disgrace to this country, Jimmy – as well as “a liar and a bigot and an anti-Semite and a coward and a plagiarist."

Posted by: Greg at 12:04 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 368 words, total size 2 kb.

On one level, I have to agree with Justice Scalia on this point – but on another level, I think he is dead wrong.

During an appearance at Iona College, Scalia said Florida's handling of the recount, which was the key to determining whether Republican George W. Bush or Democrat Al Gore became president, was a clear violation of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

"Counting somebody else's dimpled chad and not counting my dimpled chad is not giving equal protection of the law," Scalia told an audience of 700 who attended his speech at the Mulcahy Gymnasium.

Scalia, who was appointed to the court in 1986, noted that seven members of the court agreed that Florida's handling of the recount represented a violation of the equal protection clause. The controversial part of the ruling - which caused a 5-4 split on the court - was the decision that there was not enough time for Florida to develop proper standards to count the ballots.

"The whole world was laughing at the world's greatest democracy," Scalia said "They could not complete an election."

Scalia's comments about perhaps the most controversial decision of his tenure came during a brief question-and-answer period that followed his half-hour speech. He let it be known that it's time for people to stop rehashing the decision.

"It's water over the deck - get over it," Scalia said, eliciting a loud burst of laughter from the audience.

Now as a practical matter, I think that Antonin Scalia is correct – over six years after the fact, the time is long-since past for folks to let their hate and vitriol fall by the wayside. On the other hand, I think there is precedent value in this case that is important, and it therefore needs some rehashing. After all, the equal protection analysis of the case does have serious ramifications for future election cases.

There is also a comment quoted at the end of the article that I think needs to be dealt with – a comment from a young man in the audience, not Justice Scalia.

Scalia also savaged the notion of the Constitution as a living document, noting the problem with that view.

"The Constitution is not a living organism, for Pete's sake," Scalia said. "It's a legal document."

Accepting a living Constitution, Scalia said, means, in reality, giving the governing majority the ability to constantly rewrite the document to meet society's views of the day and add new rights and new governmental powers that were never intended by the authors. He warned that such a practice is not healthy for a democracy.

"Freedoms will be eliminated just as freedoms will be added," Scalia said.
The best example of the living-Constitution argument, Scalia said, is the evolving view of the 8th Amendment, which forbids cruel and unusual punishment.

At the time the Constitution was adopted, he explained, the death penalty was a commonly accepted punishment but now it is argued as unconstitutional.
Abortion, Scalia noted, is another issue that is being framed in constitutional terms when it is better handled by legislatures.

On this point, Scalia is 100% correct. Legal documents are supposed to be static, and interpreted according to the original language and intent of those who entered into the contact. After all, would you sign a mortgage or a contract that was a “living document” that evolved and changed over time in ways that you could not foresee? Of course not.

There is a process for making changes to the terms of legal documents – but it isn’t “make it up as you go along”, which often appears to be how certain justices approach some elements of the US Constitution. That is the amendment process, one which is little used and often neglected as activist judges simply recast and reconstrue the language that is already there in ways antithetical to the historical understanding and common-sense reading of the document.

And then there is this comment, made by one of the students in attendance, that I think needs to be dealt with.

"I think he was a little biased," said Josh O'Brien, a junior at Iona who is majoring in political science. "He showed a conservative bias. ... I think that as the times change, the laws also have to change."

O’Brien simply misunderstands the view that Scalia and the originalists have of the law and the Constitution. I know of no one who holds to a strict constructionist view of the Constitution who disagrees with the idea that the law must change as the times change. Where we part company with the “living document” proponents is HOW the law and the Constitution must be changed. Simply put, we believe that the process laid out in Article V should be followed. The alternative makes constitutional law the equivalent of quicksand, with no certain meaning to any provision.

UPDATE: Looks like Kennedy and O'Connor have also spoken on the case.

"A no-brainer! A state court deciding a federal constitutional issue about the presidential election? Of course you take the case," Kennedy told ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg in her new book, "Supreme Conflict."

Kennedy said the justices didn't ask for the case to come their way. Then-Vice President Al Gore's legal team involved the courts in the election by asking a state court to order a recount, Kennedy said.

* * * O'Connor said the Florida court was "off on a trip of its own."

She acknowledged, however, that the justices probably could have done a better job with the opinion if they hadn't been rushed.

Still, O'Connor said the outcome of the election would have been the same even if the court had not intervened.

She was referring to studies that suggest Bush would have won a recount limited to counties that Gore initially contested, although other studies said Gore might have prevailed in a statewide recount.

I do have one problem with this new article, though -- while it repeatedly argues that the case was decided 5-4, that was not the case. The decision was 7-2 that the recount as conducted under the supervision of SCOFLA (Supreme Court of Florida) was unconstitutional. The 5-4 portion regarded the remedy -- whether there should be another recount or not. Unfortunately, the appropriately named SCOFLA had run the clock out in such a way as to make a recount impossible under the constitutional and statutory deadlines that existed under Florida and federal law.

Posted by: Greg at 12:03 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1001 words, total size 7 kb.

On one level, I have to agree with Justice Scalia on this point – but on another level, I think he is dead wrong.

During an appearance at Iona College, Scalia said Florida's handling of the recount, which was the key to determining whether Republican George W. Bush or Democrat Al Gore became president, was a clear violation of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

"Counting somebody else's dimpled chad and not counting my dimpled chad is not giving equal protection of the law," Scalia told an audience of 700 who attended his speech at the Mulcahy Gymnasium.

Scalia, who was appointed to the court in 1986, noted that seven members of the court agreed that Florida's handling of the recount represented a violation of the equal protection clause. The controversial part of the ruling - which caused a 5-4 split on the court - was the decision that there was not enough time for Florida to develop proper standards to count the ballots.

"The whole world was laughing at the world's greatest democracy," Scalia said "They could not complete an election."

Scalia's comments about perhaps the most controversial decision of his tenure came during a brief question-and-answer period that followed his half-hour speech. He let it be known that it's time for people to stop rehashing the decision.

"It's water over the deck - get over it," Scalia said, eliciting a loud burst of laughter from the audience.

Now as a practical matter, I think that Antonin Scalia is correct – over six years after the fact, the time is long-since past for folks to let their hate and vitriol fall by the wayside. On the other hand, I think there is precedent value in this case that is important, and it therefore needs some rehashing. After all, the equal protection analysis of the case does have serious ramifications for future election cases.

There is also a comment quoted at the end of the article that I think needs to be dealt with – a comment from a young man in the audience, not Justice Scalia.

Scalia also savaged the notion of the Constitution as a living document, noting the problem with that view.

"The Constitution is not a living organism, for Pete's sake," Scalia said. "It's a legal document."

Accepting a living Constitution, Scalia said, means, in reality, giving the governing majority the ability to constantly rewrite the document to meet society's views of the day and add new rights and new governmental powers that were never intended by the authors. He warned that such a practice is not healthy for a democracy.

"Freedoms will be eliminated just as freedoms will be added," Scalia said.
The best example of the living-Constitution argument, Scalia said, is the evolving view of the 8th Amendment, which forbids cruel and unusual punishment.

At the time the Constitution was adopted, he explained, the death penalty was a commonly accepted punishment but now it is argued as unconstitutional.
Abortion, Scalia noted, is another issue that is being framed in constitutional terms when it is better handled by legislatures.

On this point, Scalia is 100% correct. Legal documents are supposed to be static, and interpreted according to the original language and intent of those who entered into the contact. After all, would you sign a mortgage or a contract that was a “living document” that evolved and changed over time in ways that you could not foresee? Of course not.

There is a process for making changes to the terms of legal documents – but it isn’t “make it up as you go along”, which often appears to be how certain justices approach some elements of the US Constitution. That is the amendment process, one which is little used and often neglected as activist judges simply recast and reconstrue the language that is already there in ways antithetical to the historical understanding and common-sense reading of the document.

And then there is this comment, made by one of the students in attendance, that I think needs to be dealt with.

"I think he was a little biased," said Josh O'Brien, a junior at Iona who is majoring in political science. "He showed a conservative bias. ... I think that as the times change, the laws also have to change."

O’Brien simply misunderstands the view that Scalia and the originalists have of the law and the Constitution. I know of no one who holds to a strict constructionist view of the Constitution who disagrees with the idea that the law must change as the times change. Where we part company with the “living document” proponents is HOW the law and the Constitution must be changed. Simply put, we believe that the process laid out in Article V should be followed. The alternative makes constitutional law the equivalent of quicksand, with no certain meaning to any provision.

UPDATE: Looks like Kennedy and O'Connor have also spoken on the case.

"A no-brainer! A state court deciding a federal constitutional issue about the presidential election? Of course you take the case," Kennedy told ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg in her new book, "Supreme Conflict."

Kennedy said the justices didn't ask for the case to come their way. Then-Vice President Al Gore's legal team involved the courts in the election by asking a state court to order a recount, Kennedy said.

* * * O'Connor said the Florida court was "off on a trip of its own."

She acknowledged, however, that the justices probably could have done a better job with the opinion if they hadn't been rushed.

Still, O'Connor said the outcome of the election would have been the same even if the court had not intervened.

She was referring to studies that suggest Bush would have won a recount limited to counties that Gore initially contested, although other studies said Gore might have prevailed in a statewide recount.

I do have one problem with this new article, though -- while it repeatedly argues that the case was decided 5-4, that was not the case. The decision was 7-2 that the recount as conducted under the supervision of SCOFLA (Supreme Court of Florida) was unconstitutional. The 5-4 portion regarded the remedy -- whether there should be another recount or not. Unfortunately, the appropriately named SCOFLA had run the clock out in such a way as to make a recount impossible under the constitutional and statutory deadlines that existed under Florida and federal law.

Posted by: Greg at 12:03 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 1010 words, total size 7 kb.

Here is a historical tidbit on the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist. It seems that the pair wanted to avoid the possibility of a double vacancy – and that Rehnquist’s decision to stay forced O’Connor out. But then again, she wanted to go, given her husband’s slow descent into the twilight world of Alzheimer’s disease.

By June, with only weeks left in the term, O'Connor went to visit her old friend again. Even though he had been coming to the court every day, she, like the other justices, still believed he would be retiring soon. She'd begun to think she would spend one more year on the court before retiring herself.

She knew that Rehnquist believed emphatically that the court shouldn't have two retirements at the same time. She guessed that he would imminently announce his retirement, allowing her to stay one more year.

She guessed wrong.

He stunned her by telling her: "I want to stay another year."

O'Connor was caught off guard. Rehnquist's implication was clear: She must retire now or be prepared to serve two more years. Rehnquist was unilaterally deciding both of their fates.

Now these two had known each other for over half a century, dating back to Stanford Law School. I believe IÂ’ve even read, though I do not remember where, that at some point the two future justices may have dated once or twice. They were certainly more than colleagues, they were friends.

And that leads me to wonder. Was Rehnquist’s decision one predicated upon personal stubbornness and a refusal to face his on mortality? Or was it a personal sacrifice by one friend on behalf of another – trying to stick it out so that O’Connor could have that last bit of quality time with the man she loves, despite Rehnquist’s own infirmity? I don’t know, but I’d like to believe it was the latter. And while his decision resulted in that very double vacancy that the Chief Justice wished to avoid, I believe the result is a stronger Supreme Court.

Posted by: Greg at 12:02 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 2 kb.

If these three young men are, in fact, guilty as charged, they need to be locked away for a very long time.

Three football players at Guilford College, a school with a Quaker background, face assault and ethnic intimidation charges after an attack on three Palestinian students, authorities said.

The victims were beaten with fists, feet and brass knuckles early Saturday by attackers who called them "terrorists" and used racial slurs, the News & Record of Greensboro reported Tuesday.

School officials believe about 12 people were involved in the altercation, Nic Brown, spokesman for the college in Greensboro, told The Associated Press. Administrators were still trying to determine whether some were fighting or trying to break it up, Brown said.

"We've had a very, very unfortunate event, unfortunate conflict among students who actually knew each other, and who had lived and interacted in the same residence hall with no conflict among themselves," Brown said.

Authorities charged Michael Bates, 19, of Reidsville, North Carolina; Michael Robert Six, 20, of Greensboro, North Carolina; and Christopher Barnette, 21, of Semora, North Carolina, with ethnic intimidation and assault and battery, according to court documents. They were released Monday on $2,000 (euro1,500) bail.

Now I’m opposed to the “ethnic intimidation” charge on principle, but the assault charge alone is disturbing. The victims of this attack, assuming this was an unprovoked altercation, did nothing to deserve what happened to them. Forget the ethnicity angle and focus on the real crime – seemingly random violence against fellow human beings.

But I do urge that everyone wait until the investigation is complete and the evidence is in -- because there seems to be a lot more evidence left out of this report than what is included.

Posted by: Greg at 11:12 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.

If these three young men are, in fact, guilty as charged, they need to be locked away for a very long time.

Three football players at Guilford College, a school with a Quaker background, face assault and ethnic intimidation charges after an attack on three Palestinian students, authorities said.

The victims were beaten with fists, feet and brass knuckles early Saturday by attackers who called them "terrorists" and used racial slurs, the News & Record of Greensboro reported Tuesday.

School officials believe about 12 people were involved in the altercation, Nic Brown, spokesman for the college in Greensboro, told The Associated Press. Administrators were still trying to determine whether some were fighting or trying to break it up, Brown said.

"We've had a very, very unfortunate event, unfortunate conflict among students who actually knew each other, and who had lived and interacted in the same residence hall with no conflict among themselves," Brown said.

Authorities charged Michael Bates, 19, of Reidsville, North Carolina; Michael Robert Six, 20, of Greensboro, North Carolina; and Christopher Barnette, 21, of Semora, North Carolina, with ethnic intimidation and assault and battery, according to court documents. They were released Monday on $2,000 (euro1,500) bail.

Now I’m opposed to the “ethnic intimidation” charge on principle, but the assault charge alone is disturbing. The victims of this attack, assuming this was an unprovoked altercation, did nothing to deserve what happened to them. Forget the ethnicity angle and focus on the real crime – seemingly random violence against fellow human beings.

But I do urge that everyone wait until the investigation is complete and the evidence is in -- because there seems to be a lot more evidence left out of this report than what is included.

Posted by: Greg at 11:12 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 294 words, total size 2 kb.

If, as this quote indicates, he does, then perhaps we local GOP activists need to work to get rid of him. This exchange occurred on the Alex Jones radio show. (MP3 here)

CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I'm tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?

HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don't have that in place. It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight. But you know, for top level policy there's not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn't going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.

JACK BLOOD, GUEST HOST: I think it's fair to say that of all the candidates out there, the one most interested in reopening the investigation and clearing the questions is Dr. Paul; and you should be commended for that.

Now maybe he was humoring the moonbat caller. Maybe he was lacking in his normal grace with the English language. Or maybe he was revealing a side to his views that places him so far outside the mainstream as to require people with common decency and common sense to take action against him.

Needless to say, I'm disturbed -- and I hope the good congressman will clarify his views and explain (if he can) these comments.

H/T Right Wing News

Posted by: Greg at 01:42 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 310 words, total size 2 kb.

That is the question that columnist and blogger Daniel Friedman asks in this piece, “Can I Be President?”

Forget Giuliani, McCain, Romney, Obama, and Clinton. There is only one candidate that every American envisions in the White House: oneself. Which American, at least as a child, never once daydreamed of sitting behind the big desk in the Oval Office Â… leader of the free world Â… fighting evil and protecting freedom?

And I was no different. Well, slightly different. I was born and raised in London, spoke the Queen's English, and never heard the date 1776 mentioned in school. But as an American citizen — born to an American mother and a British father — I too dreamed of being president. Sure being prime minister was cool, my friends certainly thought so, but who dreams of being Robin when you can be Batman?

A high school teacher shattered these dreams (don't they always?) by telling me that "natural born citizen means born in America." Sidekick it was from then on. But while living in Brussels a few years ago, an American colleague pointed out — after I told him that he was doing his children a disservice by not having them in America — that it's unclear whether children born to American citizens overseas really can't be president.

Friedman notes that many people argue that he cannot. On the other hand, my answer has always been quite the opposite – that natural born, rather than native born, would certainly be inclusive of those born American citizens regardless of their place of birth. That would include those Americans born abroad to American citizens, such as military dependents, the children of diplomats, and other expats. After all, if they are not naturalized citizens, they must be natural born citizens.

Posted by: Greg at 10:44 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.